Max stroke on LS1?
#6
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Originally Posted by rollinna65
Probably 383, but there's no point in stroking it without a bigger bore.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salado, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Not true, there's plenty of TQ to be gained with the added stroke. Not everyone has the money to resleeve there motor, or buy a LS2 block. JRP stated it correctly. The most you can do on the stock sleeves is 4.125. Anything longer and the crank will pull the piston down to far in the bore, which will cause you to have to have a short ring stack that may not be suitable for much more than a mild N/A application.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Not true, there's plenty of TQ to be gained with the added stroke. Not everyone has the money to resleeve there motor, or buy a LS2 block. JRP stated it correctly. The most you can do on the stock sleeves is 4.125. Anything longer and the crank will pull the piston down to far in the bore, which will cause you to have to have a short ring stack that may not be suitable for much more than a mild N/A application.
#10
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Originally Posted by rollinna65
I was under the impression that running a longer stroke crank on a stock bore would indeed add more torque down low but wouldn't give you much more horsepower.