Lifter deflection...How much?
#1
Lifter deflection...How much?
Does anyone know how much a hydraulic lifter compresses (if any) as it takes up the pressure in opening the valve spring? ( when the engine is running and the oil has pressurized the lifter) I would think the pressure of the spring would have something to do with it? Any suggestions appreciated.
#4
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by 777
This may sound newbish, but then what's the point of a hydraulic lifter if it acts as a solid lifter?
As the oil fills the lifter up, it takes up any free slack in the valvetrain. Think of hydraulic lifters as automatic lash setting lifters. Too much valve spring pressure can push the oil right out of the lifter and collapse it.
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
Ok, that's what I was thinking, but the way you said it got me confused. But actually we know nothing. We are brainwashed of everything as soon as we become mods. Then we have to search for all of the information. Since search is broke I've been struggling It's just so Brian, Tony, and John can laugh at us.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by 777
Ok, that's what I was thinking, but the way you said it got me confused. But actually we know nothing. We are brainwashed of everything as soon as we become mods. Then we have to search for all of the information. Since search is broke I've been struggling It's just so Brian, Tony, and John can laugh at us.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by MadBill
There is another thread floating around that gets into great detail re lifter collapse due to air in the oil, and sometimes because of lifter body distortion...
#9
Thanks...you guys sort of answered my question. I think I would argue that it compresses a little bit...say ... .005 to .010. I guess i should rig up an oil pump to provide 60 psi to the engine, turn it over manually and measure the deflection if any. I appreciate the thoughts.
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
Thanks...you guys sort of answered my question. I think I would argue that it compresses a little bit...say ... .005 to .010. I guess i should rig up an oil pump to provide 60 psi to the engine, turn it over manually and measure the deflection if any. I appreciate the thoughts.
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Well, its not "fully" incompressible. You will also get distortion of the lifter as well as the pushrod, with the pushrod likely being the biggest contributor to lift reduction. I also wouldn't count on a static roll the motor over test, the dynamics involved are going to change loading on the lifter dramatically.
#15
I know what you are saying about a liquid not being able to be compressed but there is a pushback happening from the spring pressure. When the lifter starts opening the valve (say a 100lbs on the seat + the rocker ratio) and then continues to open the valve to say 320 lbs the pushback on the oil in the lifter increases dramitically and the oil pressure is a constant in the engine. I understand the hydraulics involved but It seems there must be a small deflection of the lifter? If the lifter were used with a 600 lb spring it would deflect or collapse right?
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
I know what you are saying about a liquid not being able to be compressed but there is a pushback happening from the spring pressure. When the lifter starts opening the valve (say a 100lbs on the seat + the rocker ratio) and then continues to open the valve to say 320 lbs the pushback on the oil in the lifter increases dramitically and the oil pressure is a constant in the engine. I understand the hydraulics involved but It seems there must be a small deflection of the lifter? If the lifter were used with a 600 lb spring it would deflect or collapse right?
#17
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland/Illinois
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All you guy are basically correct. Oil (and water) is engineering wise considered incompressible, assuming no air vapor is present. In reality those liquids will compress a very tiny amount, which is considered negligible in engineering calculations. Hell, even air is considred incompressible up to mach 0.9 or so.
Bottom line is with the tiny amount of oil in a lifter and the tiny amount it will compress you aren't going to be able to measure any differnce based solely on oil compressing. Now, if you have air trapped in there that's a different game.
Also, if the pressure on the oil got high enough it could deflect the lifter itself. It would have to get pretty high though, typical hydraulic systems run at 3000-4000 psi, occasianally more. I would guess you would need valvespring pressures more than 1000 lbs to see lifter deflection (educated specualtion there).
Bottom line is with the tiny amount of oil in a lifter and the tiny amount it will compress you aren't going to be able to measure any differnce based solely on oil compressing. Now, if you have air trapped in there that's a different game.
Also, if the pressure on the oil got high enough it could deflect the lifter itself. It would have to get pretty high though, typical hydraulic systems run at 3000-4000 psi, occasianally more. I would guess you would need valvespring pressures more than 1000 lbs to see lifter deflection (educated specualtion there).
#18
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bowtieman81
All you guy are basically correct. Oil (and water) is engineering wise considered incompressible, assuming no air vapor is present. In reality those liquids will compress a very tiny amount, which is considered negligible in engineering calculations. Hell, even air is considred incompressible up to mach 0.9 or so.
Also like said above it would take considerable pressure to accomplish the task of compression but, a consequence of compressing a fluid is that the viscosity, that is the resistance of the fluid to flow, also increases as the density increases. This is because the atoms are forced closer together, and thus cannot slip by each other as easily as they can when the fluid is at atmospheric pressure.
I don't think that this would be a problem in an ls1.
#19
12 Second Club
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is my theory. solid lifters are hard on valve train during idle, plus dont pump up oil into the heads as much as hyd. lifters do. hyd. lifters at idle pump up more oil to heads due to the pumping action of lifters during idle. oil keeps metal cool. the more the better! right? now at high rpm's the hyd lifter does not have time to compress much compared to engine at idle,but even at high rpm's hyd lifters do have some pump action which will provide more oil then a solid lifter. so you wont get full lift at high rpm's w/ hyd lftr. as compared to solid lifters.with this all said, oil viscosity and aeration in oil has affect on this as well .
so you ask how much does hyd lifters compress, would depend on how oil aeration affects the brand of oil u r using, spring pressure that takes to compress, rpm's and cam lift.
I'm sure there is more to this , but I;m trying to keep it simple.
hope this helps some.
fuerzaws6
so you ask how much does hyd lifters compress, would depend on how oil aeration affects the brand of oil u r using, spring pressure that takes to compress, rpm's and cam lift.
I'm sure there is more to this , but I;m trying to keep it simple.
hope this helps some.
fuerzaws6
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Oil pressure internal to the lifter is higher than the engine oil pressure since it is trapped under the piston. As the pressure increases, don't forget you are holding it in an elastic chamber, in other words the lifter itself will expand some very small amount. We see this all the time when we dynamically load hydraulic actuators and power cylinders at work although the chamber volume in which the compressed oil resides is much larger.
For valvetrain deflection, I think you are fishing in the wrong pond. In the end these are going to be smaller numbers in comparison to other valve train phenomina that are taking place like pushrod deflection, rocker deflection, etc. as the valve is opened and to observe these you have to have the engine dynamics taking place, static deflections are going to tell the whole story.
For valvetrain deflection, I think you are fishing in the wrong pond. In the end these are going to be smaller numbers in comparison to other valve train phenomina that are taking place like pushrod deflection, rocker deflection, etc. as the valve is opened and to observe these you have to have the engine dynamics taking place, static deflections are going to tell the whole story.