Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bore size on 382 stroker motor??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2006, 01:41 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
redtransam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texarkana, AR
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Bore size on 382 stroker motor??

Hey guys need some help here. I was lookin into either doin a 382 or 383 stroker kit. I was wonderin wut preperation I would need to do the block. Do I need to bore out the block to make room for bigger pistons or are they the same? Im sorry for all the questions. Im just trying to figure out wut all I need to know before i jump into all this. Also which one would ya do the 382 or 383. And any other things I might need to know please let me know.
Old 01-30-2006, 01:43 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
mnc2886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redtransam02
Hey guys need some help here. I was lookin into either doin a 382 or 383 stroker kit. I was wonderin wut preperation I would need to do the block. Do I need to bore out the block to make room for bigger pistons or are they the same? Im sorry for all the questions. Im just trying to figure out wut all I need to know before i jump into all this. Also which one would ya do the 382 or 383. And any other things I might need to know please let me know.
The bore is stock size. A machine shop will blue print your block and prep it for a forged bottom end, but honestly, strokers are a waste. A 383 really doesn't make any more power than a heads/cam car. Just a little more torque. Honestly, do some research on a 402 because in my opinion a stroker kit isn't going to do anything for you.
Old 01-30-2006, 01:57 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
redtransam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texarkana, AR
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info. Let me ask this then. Im prolly goin to go with a procharger would that go better with just heads an cam or a 402. This will be a daily driver now. So I have to keep that in mind too. Thanks for all the help.
Old 01-30-2006, 03:37 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mnc2886
The bore is stock size. A machine shop will blue print your block and prep it for a forged bottom end, but honestly, strokers are a waste. A 383 really doesn't make any more power than a heads/cam car. Just a little more torque. Honestly, do some research on a 402 because in my opinion a stroker kit isn't going to do anything for you.
thats crazy..no comparison between a 347 and 382 done right.

I think you are better off going with a 347 or and iron block 408 for big boost.
Old 01-30-2006, 03:38 PM
  #5  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mnc2886
The bore is stock size. A machine shop will blue print your block and prep it for a forged bottom end, but honestly, strokers are a waste. A 383 really doesn't make any more power than a heads/cam car. Just a little more torque. Honestly, do some research on a 402 because in my opinion a stroker kit isn't going to do anything for you.
Wow, that's an amazing statement. Totally contradicts tens of thousands of racers who go faster with strokers. A 383 is a larger air pump than a 346 and setup correctly, it will make more power, not just more torque.

Tony Mamo is making well over 600 hp with the 383 in his C5. Look for chassis dyno numbers in the near future.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 01-30-2006, 06:47 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
mnc2886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
Wow, that's an amazing statement. Totally contradicts tens of thousands of racers who go faster with strokers. A 383 is a larger air pump than a 346 and setup correctly, it will make more power, not just more torque.

Tony Mamo is making well over 600 hp with the 383 in his C5. Look for chassis dyno numbers in the near future.
Sorry guys, I've just never seen any better than an aggressive heads/cam car. I understand piston speed should be faster, but every 382-383 doesn't make more than 480 or 490 to the ground. Bad *** heads and the right cam seem to do that on stock bottom ends. Just my opinion that a stroker is so close to a 402 or 408 in price that you might as well just do it. I just see them as a waste of money. As far as what this guy is concerned, for boost I would go iron block for the best reliabilty. Just do a 6.0L if you want to keep it tame for the street.
Old 01-30-2006, 06:55 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a 383 can make more power, more torque, and do it more with more reliability and keep it more streetable than a crazy aggressive h/c car. 383's make power all day long, starting down low. crazy 346's are all mid-high to high end.
Old 01-30-2006, 07:25 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mnc2886
I understand piston speed should be faster, but every 382-383 doesn't make more than 480 or 490 to the ground. Bad *** heads and the right cam seem to do that on stock bottom ends. Just my opinion that a stroker is so close to a 402 or 408 in price that you might as well just do it. I just see them as a waste of money. As far as what this guy is concerned, for boost I would go iron block for the best reliabilty.
There is more to it than peak dyno numbers. Compare the powerbands and you will see the diffference. A 402 or 408 is not close to the same price when you already have a LS1 block. And reliability, how many aluminum blocks have you heard of blowing up under boost?
Old 01-30-2006, 07:37 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
1BADAIR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: oxford, Michigan
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my 382 doesn't make great power and actually feels slower than other big hp 347's I have been in. I swore the car felt slower but because my 382 makes over 400ft lbs at 3000rpm it never stops pulling unlike my 346 witch was peaky
Old 01-31-2006, 07:00 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mnc2886
Sorry guys, I've just never seen any better than an aggressive heads/cam car. I understand piston speed should be faster, but every 382-383 doesn't make more than 480 or 490 to the ground. Bad *** heads and the right cam seem to do that on stock bottom ends. Just my opinion that a stroker is so close to a 402 or 408 in price that you might as well just do it. I just see them as a waste of money. As far as what this guy is concerned, for boost I would go iron block for the best reliabilty. Just do a 6.0L if you want to keep it tame for the street.
Dude, I make 480rwhp with small valve LS1 heads..not LS6 or AFR or ETP..and 92 octane with a cam that was more for sound than power. 383s can **** 500+rwhp now no problem...and there is no comparison with the torque and area under the curve. Just because some guys dont know how to pick the right combos lets not assume they dont perform..there are alot of 347s that cant get out of their own way from the wrong combo of parts...as well as 402/408s.

But yes..383s are obsolete with the 402s/408s being more bang for the buck now.
Old 01-31-2006, 07:49 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
redtransam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texarkana, AR
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the info guys. I really appreciate it.
Old 01-31-2006, 08:46 AM
  #12  
Teching In
 
99Transamman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orange Park
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nothing wrong with a 383. I put down 497/460 threw a 9in with 4.11s. would be well over 500 if not for the rearend. As stated above, just got to pick the right combo.
Good luck




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.