Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tr224 vs f13 which is better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2006, 10:24 PM
  #41  
pdd
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
pdd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: dudley mass
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ive had the f14 and fm11. im switching to a smaller cam, a 226-230. the fm14 was a bear to drive in a parking lot, lots of bucking, it stalled at lights many times and i had a pro tune it. other than that the cam was great. just be aware that bigger cams you have to stay on top of them

p.s. i have 4.10's also
Old 03-14-2006, 12:20 PM
  #42  
On The Tree
 
okls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok thanks, now I really think the 224 will disappoint me. Maybe TR230, FM13, or torquer v.2. But as you said pdd maybe a bigger cam will suck for DD. I guess if I go with dual springs and Ti retainers there wont be much to worry bout, maybe lifters? Still have to do more research. Thanks for all the imput everyone.
Old 03-14-2006, 01:44 PM
  #43  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
HALLZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by okls1
This was on a different thread and this is why I asked. So on the street would a TR224 ususally take it? Since the FM13 would have to play catch up? From this chart I dont understand how an extra 10rwhp above 5600 would help it catch the 224?
Well woudl it look to you that my set up would have to play much catch up?

Old 03-14-2006, 01:58 PM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
2000Z28M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C.C., TX
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I dont think ones better than the other, it depends on your application.

I think it really comes down to what you want and what you are willing to compromise. There will always be a compromise wheather its suspension, Power mods or rearend. If your car is a DD why would you want a high peaking cam with big lopes that would be harsh on your car? Remember what others have said, stock LS1s will not spin over 6600rpm safely on a regular basis. For a DD most people agree that the area under the curve is where its at. FYI the TR224 112 was the largest anyone would try at one point. I wonder why. There is nothing wrong with that cam. Especially since its kind to your valvetrain as well. ANother thing to thing about. Other cams and springs will require you maintain them alot sooner than a TR224. Just sum thing to think bout.
Old 03-14-2006, 02:52 PM
  #45  
On The Tree
 
okls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice graph hallz, what is your setup cam only? 2000z28m6 that is true, although if I had dual springs that would help. What do you run with your 224? You like it? I have started to think the 224 would not be enough. That is my only concern with it.
Old 03-14-2006, 03:06 PM
  #46  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HALLZ
Well woudl it look to you that my set up would have to play much catch up?

yes, it does to me.
mustang dyno numbers
Attached Thumbnails tr224 vs f13 which is better-p1010013.jpg  
Old 03-14-2006, 04:54 PM
  #47  
12 Second Club
 
RoastEmSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by okls1
Ok thanks, now I really think the 224 will disappoint me. Maybe TR230, FM13, or torquer v.2. But as you said pdd maybe a bigger cam will suck for DD. I guess if I go with dual springs and Ti retainers there wont be much to worry bout, maybe lifters? Still have to do more research. Thanks for all the imput everyone.
I'm am also deciding between those three cams
Old 03-14-2006, 06:40 PM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
2000Z28M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C.C., TX
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

99blancoSS thats a sweet comparison....
Old 03-14-2006, 09:38 PM
  #49  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000Z28M6
99blancoSS thats a sweet comparison....
I'm heading to a dynojet in a week to get dynojet numbers instead of guessing at them. The general rule of thumb is 8-12% difference from a mustang dyno but you just never really know until you check it.
Old 03-14-2006, 09:47 PM
  #50  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
VTC_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have a question for those running the F13 in particular, I just bought this cam for my car and my main concern now is the longevity of the bottom end. How well does the stock LS1 bottom end stand up to 6500rpm? Granted the car won't see that high an rpm on a regular basis perse, but the car WILL see the track and thus will see 6500 from time to time, so... anybody out there wanna chime in? Particularly those with alot of hands-on time with the bottom ends.
Old 03-14-2006, 09:54 PM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
2000Z28M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C.C., TX
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I dont think you have to be an expert to know that engines that race will eventually loose compression and overall strength, so it really comes down to how lucky will you be before it happens? Cuz its goin to happen anyway. With that said I think your abuse to the engine will determine the answer to your question. But I can defintly say lots of people beat up on these motors and they take a beating. When it happens. One word Rebuild! as a stroker!!
Old 03-14-2006, 09:57 PM
  #52  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

The TR224 is a nice all around cam. Each cam has its benefits, but again, you have to know what you want the car to do first.

I am also trying to decide on a cam and I am seriously considering the TR224 again because it was anice cam to have on the street...idles nice...didnt give me any problems...and made enough power.

A lot of people want the biggest cam they can get, and thats fine if they can safely spin the engine fast enought to take advantage of it. Then it needs a better tune to run well on the street.
Old 03-14-2006, 10:06 PM
  #53  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its really an RPM thing. At any given rpm under say 5800 rpms I'm outpulling most if not all other cams. But if your gonna play above that line its not the best cam for the job. In other words in order to take advantage of that big cam with the big peak you need to actualy be in the rpm range that the power comes on in. The bigger the duration the latter the power. 6500 rpms on stock rod bolts and stock rockers is about the safe limit but you have plenty of people doing things past that. Longevity of the engine? Is that a concern or not is the real question. I can make my stock bottom end last a lot longer if I dont stress it too much. 550rwhp is about the limit.



Quick Reply: tr224 vs f13 which is better



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.