Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

04 LS6 cam 370 rwhp/370 tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2006 | 10:27 AM
  #21  
02RedHawk's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan02SS
My old LS6 cam setup made 376rwhp @ 361rwtq SAE with all the bolt ons. It pulled good up top but it's lowend was not much more over the stock cam until 4500rpms. I swapped in my current TR224 and gained 23rwhp @ 24rwtq at peak. The TR224 power under the curve blew away the LS6 cam as at some rpms ranges the TR224 was up 30rwtq over the LS6.

This is great to know. My TSP 224R cam is being installed in about a month, along with my Stg-II LS6 heads. Hope for ~50rwhp out of that combo.
Old 03-28-2006 | 07:19 PM
  #22  
MiaSSmaro98's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fl
Default

how much more gain will the 224r give over the normal 224?
Old 03-28-2006 | 10:05 PM
  #23  
FUN LS1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
From: Herndon, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 777
This alone isn't saying much. I mean if you were making 360rwhp with bolt-ons then you gained 10rwhp. Not a big gain. I know not many make that much with bolt-ons but you get the point. Nice numbers anyhow. If my engine was fresh instead of being 108k miles old. I would be willing to bet I would be in the low 400's for sure with just a 224 cam but ~390 isn't bad I guess for now.
...another yeah, I dyno'd (Mustang) 335/345 with just bolt-ons in the sig; no udp, stock TB. I think it would be quite a bit higher with a decent tune and on a Dyno Jet, it's just got a canned DiabloSport SLP tune that's rich in a couple of spots. I can't wait to do the head/cam swap. It takes so much stinking saving to do it right: new rod bolts, heads & cam and intake at the same time, etc...



Quick Reply: 04 LS6 cam 370 rwhp/370 tq



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.