XRE vs. Cammotion Lobes

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 3, 2006 | 11:11 PM

ThirdGenLS1

Thread Starter

TECH Resident

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 987

Likes: 0

From: Boston

XE-R vs. Cammotion Lobes

Alright been looking a lot at the TSP and Futral lobes and wanted to get some feed back on how they compare since they both use different kind of lobes. I know the comp is a little more aggressive lobe compared to the futral lobe, but basicly wanted to know easactly how that will relate to the real world. (driving around town, power, etc.)

I was looking at the torquer or the F14 cam, and since they are baslcy the same at .50 inch i didnt now how they would relate.

Thanks a lot.
Justin

Last edited by ThirdGenLS1; Mar 4, 2006 at 12:02 PM.

Mar 4, 2006 | 03:09 AM

orangeapeel

ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™

iTrader: (18)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 16,083

Likes: 4

From: Justin, TX

Im not trying to be a punk, but you meant to type XER right?

Mar 4, 2006 | 11:33 AM

ThirdGenLS1

Thread Starter

TECH Resident

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 987

Likes: 0

From: Boston

haha yea sorry, it was late when i typed that.

Mar 4, 2006 | 11:40 AM

PREDATOR-Z

TECH Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 14,620

Likes: 17

From: BFE

Like you said XE-R is a bit of a faster ramp rate (49)
While Cam motion is (50 and 51), while they look similar at .050, they differ at .200/.400
Bottom line with a good tune they are both in the same power range

Mar 4, 2006 | 12:02 PM

ThirdGenLS1

Thread Starter

TECH Resident

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 987

Likes: 0

From: Boston

so basicly from what i'm hearing the comp is a little more aggressive(lope harder, etc). But when it comes to power the difference is going to be very slim. So should i just go with the cheaper one, and put more money into the tune.