Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Though I would pass this on. . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2006, 09:55 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts

Default Thought I would pass this on. . .

. . .it came up on one of the marine boards that at the end of '07 the highest octane available at gas stations will be 91. This is a federal law that will go into effect. Any state that does not comply with this will loose there federal money. This was pointed out to the board by an engine mfg and that is one reason he is gearing his selection of marine engines to BIG CID and low compression to make good useable HP in the future.

Last edited by Cstraub; 03-29-2006 at 03:28 PM.
Old 03-29-2006, 10:03 AM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
2mffZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: so cal
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Welcome to California, Weve only had 91 for years now. Dont worry you can still go fast.........
Old 03-29-2006, 10:15 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
OneMeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well that kinda blows
Old 03-29-2006, 10:19 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

A can of paint thinner for each tank will fix that. Hell, but the end of '07, a gallon of xylene will probably be cheaper than a gallon of gas!
Old 03-29-2006, 10:36 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ArKay99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington Township, NJ
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why is lower octane good for the government? Is it because it burns cleaner? I would think a higher octane would burn cleaner. As I see it, politicians are just one step up from child molesters and this just proves it one more time.
Old 03-29-2006, 01:35 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (100)
 
ROCNDAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,725
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

wow
Old 03-29-2006, 03:19 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this just applys to gas stations right? There will still be race fuels available right?
Old 03-29-2006, 03:23 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92zcamaroperson
this just applys to gas stations right? There will still be race fuels available right?
Im sure youll still be able to get race fuels.
Old 03-29-2006, 03:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
Black Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've heard nothing of this. Could someone please cite the source of this information.
Old 03-29-2006, 03:29 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

BlackZ/28,
Let me find the link. . .
Old 03-29-2006, 03:30 PM
  #11  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
V8pwrdz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that sucks, no more 93 here guess.
Old 03-29-2006, 03:33 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Here is the post by Ray Brodie of Raylar Engines. They make heads, intakes, and now a 600 CID engine based on the GM 8.1L Vortec platform.

Thought I would add my perspective here. First, we have done a tremendous amout of R&D on big inch marine BBC engines with our new HO725 engine (600 cubic inches) and I can honestly tell you that is you are going to take a 572 cubic incher and produce 850 (real) horsepower at 6000rpms or less you are going to have to run above average non-pump gas compression. Most likely 10.5 to one to 12.5 to one and a big cam that will not be to friendly for long idles and will most likely make peak power around 6200 rpms or more. Some of todays high performance boaters are going to have to get a little more realistic with thier expectations and realize a few things. First, all 91+ octane fuel is mandated to disappear in all states by 2007, yes thats right 2007, less than a year away! so unless you plan to fill your 100 gallon plus tank with race fuel and you rob banks during the week to pay for it you could have a motor that you can't run! There really is no hocus pocus magic in big inch naturally asspirated marine motors. The real horsepower with todays good parts just comes from a combination of cubic inches+compression+ good breathing+camshaft. My expierence shows me that if you want a pump gas friendly, reliable, non-tempermental, non-supercharged,decent idle, fairly long lived big inch marine motor that will make its peak power under 6000 rpms be more realistic and settle for 700HP to 800HP and spend more time and less money enjoying your boating season longer on the same motor!
Just my thoughts from someone who makes a living developing and building motors.

Ray @ Raylar


This is off of www.offshoreonly.com
Old 03-29-2006, 05:00 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
kenp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cincinnati Area
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I did a search and I don't see any octane resitictions for refineries in 2008.

What's the US Senate Bill or EPA directive or regulation?
Old 03-29-2006, 05:05 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
Black Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kenp
I did a search and I don't see any octane resitictions for refineries in 2008.

What's the US Senate Bill or EPA directive or regulation?
Exactly. This probably would have to have gone through congress for approval.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.