Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Head CFM Analysis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #1  
AintQik's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default Head CFM Analysis

I'm no head expert... Trying to learn here. I've got a set of stock casting LS6 heads that were done by a sponser here. They flowed less than their advertised numbers and I'm not really sure if they are any good at all. Maybe some of you guys can chime in and let me know if these things are lacking. Yes I know buying a set of ETPs will be stupendous... I'm using these heads on my LS2 stroker. They are paid for and no money out of pocket beats $2500 out of pocket.

I know there are lots of variables that I'm not really sure I understand but these are the numbers from the flow sheet:

Lift CFM
.100 70.7
.200 143.7
.300 211.0
.400 262.5
.500 294.1
.550 300.8
.600 308.6
.650 309.5

2.055/1.60" valves
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #2  
cws T/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

300cfm isn't lacking 402ci + 300cfm = No Traction
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #3  
383ss's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, KS
Default

those numbers look fine, but then again cfm doesn't mean a lot, especially high lift. I made 550rwhp with 293cfm @ 600 in my 408. do you know the runner volume?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #4  
huggerorange99ss's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Emporia, Kansas
Default

Im guessing the seller rated them around 320cfm. 320 is what an average set of 2.055 valve LS6 heads usually flow. But like they said, flow isnt everything. These heads will still make good power.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #5  
JZ'sTA's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 2
From: Ft. Myers Fl
Default

Those flow well.
Id use them based on the flow numbers.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #6  
AintQik's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

I don't know the runner volume. They were advertised at around 320. I am going to use them regardless, so I guess I can post some numbers with a stock casting head vrs. everybody else's aftermarkets.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Nevada, TX
Default

Originally Posted by huggerorange99ss
Im guessing the seller rated them around 320cfm. 320 is what an average set of 2.055 valve LS6 heads usually flow. But like they said, flow isnt everything. These heads will still make good power.
I agree. Thats a pretty common occurence. You should be happy with the end numbers, unless the exhaust side is really weak.

Brandon
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #8  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

For real world independant numbers, they look strong. Were your heads flowed on a 4.00" bore or something else? What bore size were they advertised on?
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #9  
huggerorange99ss's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Emporia, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
For real world independant numbers, they look strong. Were your heads flowed on a 4.00" bore or something else? What bore size were they advertised on?
This is very true, things like the bore size used on the flow bench and orifice clay can effect flow numbers greatly. What were the flow numbers above .650 lift? Also i hope they were flowed on range 5 @ 28".
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #10  
AintQik's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by huggerorange99ss
This is very true, things like the bore size used on the flow bench and orifice clay can effect flow numbers greatly. What were the flow numbers above .650 lift? Also i hope they were flowed on range 5 @ 28".
Those were some of the things I didn't understand. It had ranges 1 thru 6 but I didn't see what range they used I'll look again. Had no idea what that meant. As for bore size, it was not indicated on the sheet. I know that makes a bit of difference. There were no numbers above .650.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.