Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

N/a Or Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2006 | 08:08 AM
  #1  
blown2kss's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Default N/a Or Turbo

I have an 01 zo6, and am looking to make this vette run. But I am not sure which way to go to make my power. I would like to do this spending the least amount of money, but still be reliable.

My choices are either all motor 427 making about 600rwhp, and a 200+ shot of nitrous. Or the other option would be with forged internals on a 346 (maybe 383) with a turbo setup. either way I am looking for 800+ rwhp, but I want to get there with the least amount of money spent.


suggestions.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #2  
300bhp/ton's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Default

If you don't want to pay don't play, it's that simple.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #3  
ROJO99's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Default

My vote is with a Turbo set-up. I am being onsided here, due to the fact I am beginning the initail layout of a TT for my 99FRC.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 08:20 AM
  #4  
JstALs1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: some where in the Chi
Default

i think that either way you are going to spend alot of money to get 800 plus rwhp but i would say a big turbo and nitrous should get you close.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 09:05 AM
  #5  
conundrum07's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Default

I would go the nitrous route. Building a strong motor to handle 800rwhp and the costs of the turbo kit will cost you more. FI is by no means cheap
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #6  
blown2kss's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Default

Oh I am familiar with what I will be spending on a stroker motor to get those numbers, but I have not done a lot of research on a turbo setup. I know that I don't need big cubes to get big power from a turbo setup, and I will be doing one or the other.

[QUOTE]300bhp/ton If you don't want to pay don't play, it's that simple

I want to play and I know I have to pay, but figuring out which one costs less is Ideal...
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
300bhp/ton's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Default

Originally Posted by blown2kss
Oh I am familiar with what I will be spending on a stroker motor to get those numbers, but I have not done a lot of research on a turbo setup. I know that I don't need big cubes to get big power from a turbo setup, and I will be doing one or the other.

I want to play and I know I have to pay, but figuring out which one costs less is Ideal...
Well I might be wrong but either setup you have described seems pretty expensive and about on the limit for each setup (compoent dependant).

Do you already have a suitable chassis for such a power plant?

What sort of fuel are you planning on running?

What's the car going to be used for primarily?

600rwhp n/a is going to be one vicious race setup and personally I wouldn't have thought all that street friendly also a 200 shot is not a stroll in the park if you plan on using it regualarily.

A blown 346ci on pump petrol making 800rwhp IMO would be a tall order. Either way you could expect a large bill at the end of a nights use just for maintance and repair.

I would guess the more reliable setup would be a milder one, so maybe large displacement and FI with maybe a little nitrous on top for when you really need that extra 100bhp or so.

Either setup I think the potential cost is going to be rounded up to the nearest couple of thou so if you have that sort of money to play with I can't see it really mattering which is slightly cheaper, surley the best setup for your intended application is the way to go?

Anyhow good luck with your decision
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 11:08 AM
  #8  
NOSjohn's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Default

I would have to say turbo...but then I'm biased.

We can do a nice twin kit for you, check the site for details. Thanks!
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #9  
ls1mongrel's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, FL
Default

427 and n20 gets my vote !
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #10  
mike#9's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Apopka, Fl
Default

How bout a procharged 402? Just a suggestion.

422 solid roller with some squeeze on it would be badass!!!
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
Xtnct00WS6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 2
From: Sterling VA
Default

Between the two...I'd say turbo all the way. I love the way they sound!

Last edited by Xtnct00WS6; May 4, 2006 at 11:58 AM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #12  
SVT THIS's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Owasso, Ok
Default

If you can buy the Z06 and want to go a 427 or turbo route I am going to assume to can dish out the money to do it right. If thats the case, I vote for a forged 402 done right with a set of AFR 245s, a blower cam and a set of turbos with a nice, big intercooler. Oh, don't forget the new rear and tranny. You may or may not need a 200 shot, but it couldn't hurt
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #13  
Red91vette's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

A built up motor with nitrous will be cheaper, but you'd make more with the turbo set up and it would be more fun, also you never would have to refill the bottle.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #14  
blown2kss's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Default

thanks for the opinions, and after some further research It looks as if N/A is my best bet.

To get a motor built to handle the boost and get a turbo system to support the power will cost far more than a nitrous setup. Either way I look at it to make the big numbers will require race gas, and will be horrible on the street. Either way I make the power there will have to be multiple settings for street and race. I already spoke with multiple engine builders for the 427 route, and 600rwhp isn't difficult. It will cost a few bucks and have a rough idle, as compared to a smoother running turbo setup. Either one at close to 600rwhp will have little traction on street tires, and N/A is noticably louder than a turbo setup.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #15  
11 Bravo's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 1
From: Republic of Texas
Default

Originally Posted by blown2kss
thanks for the opinions, and after some further research It looks as if N/A is my best bet.

To get a motor built to handle the boost and get a turbo system to support the power will cost far more than a nitrous setup. Either way I look at it to make the big numbers will require race gas, and will be horrible on the street. Either way I make the power there will have to be multiple settings for street and race. I already spoke with multiple engine builders for the 427 route, and 600rwhp isn't difficult. It will cost a few bucks and have a rough idle, as compared to a smoother running turbo setup. Either one at close to 600rwhp will have little traction on street tires, and N/A is noticably louder than a turbo setup.
Good choice. Nothing wrong with a lumpy idle. The front end will be lighter and the engine easier to work on.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #16  
HaulinHawk's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: tampa fla
Default

Originally Posted by ls1mongrel
427 and n20 gets my vote !
I second that vote!
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #17  
Boostaholic's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default

If you can afford it - and believe me there is a lot more cost than just a forged bottom end and fancy turbo kit - then do the turbo setup You wont be disapointed if it is done correctly
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #18  
blown2kss's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee WI
Default

thanks; it will definately have lumpy idle, et heads, just under 12:1 compression, huge cam, and hyd roller. I didn't want a solid roller since I would have to adjust the lash, that and it would cost about 4+k more for just a few extra ponies on pump gas. A shot of nitrous will make up for that.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #19  
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Ahwatukee, Az
Default

If it were me and i was doing it the cost effective way, id say go big cubes and n20.

If you wanna go even further on a budget, I'd stick with a 408, go forged internals and spray a 200-300 shot.

you can get 550 rwhp out of an NA 408, then add a 200 shot and 750 rwhp and 800+ ft/lbs.

408's will be a couple grand cheaper then a 427 I believe.

I personally love my setup though.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:49 PM
  #20  
SVT THIS's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Owasso, Ok
Default

I believe anybody would be happy with 800+ hp/tq!
Badass numbers 2000 Tran Zam
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.