Are ls1's tougher than the average bear?
LS1 engine/powertrain strengths:
extremely stout bottom end*
***-kicking factory heads
***-kicking intake
OEM full hydraulic roller cam set-up
very rigid
very light
responds very well to hi-performance builds
T-56
hydraulic clutch
coil-near-plug distributor-less ignition
LS1 engine/powertrain weaknesses:
rod bolts*
pushrods
valve springs
oiling
dinky, 10-bolt rear-end
heads have only 4 bolts per cylinder
If you're going to build a fire-breathing street monster, you're going to replace the weak parts with aftermarket stuff, anyway. Okay, you'll go with forged pistons & rods, aftermarket pushrods, and an oil pump when you do your heads/cam/intake build. No big deal. You still have a rock-solid bottom-end (crank and 6-bolt main), and an extremely light and rigid block. None of the engine's weak points really bother me that much. What DOES tick me off, is putting the POS 4L60e (in A4 applications), and the 10-bolt rear-end behind an engine capable of such high performance right off the showroom floor. GM was putting M21, M22, TH350, & TH400 trannys, and 12-bolt rear-ends in their '60's & '70's muscle cars. WTF, did they forget how to build muscle cars over the past 30 or so years? At least the new "family" of A6 transmissions will be up to the task...now how about a decent rear-end?
Not too long ago, a lot of people thought overhead cam engines were the wave of the future, and pushrod engines were on their way out. The LSx-series of cam-in-block engines has proven that assumption dead-wrong. Pushrod power forever!
You can't beat the truth into some people. No matter how hard you try. I would be in there defending your point, but it just isn't gonna sink in.
-Russell
You can't beat the truth into some people. No matter how hard you try. I would be in there defending your point, but it just isn't gonna sink in.
-Russell
This is paul ( vital velocity ) under my girlfriends account. I have my own account but i decided with how much i use her computer ill just use her account instead of logging in and logging out.
There may have been damage to the engine prior to its' purchase, as it was bought used (35k miles) & had never been subjected to a blower or spray. One could argue all day about how the damage was created. Am simply contributing the experience to this thread. I love GM engines & am expecting great results from the "new" LS6 block. This time I'll know the block's History should an issue arise.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
here is the challange, drive from new york to california, go to 20 drag strips. one with the best average time wins. btw no "cool down period" you get straight off the interstate/traffic jammed streets and immediately run them, oh and you have to use the same tires the whole time
The Supra can handle over 900whp on the stock bottom end, which is still more then the LS1.
Man, I want a Poopra.
Nothing they all run 11s!
Nothing they all run 11s!

This is the baddest street Supra out there. Nevermind the for sale crap, it's been for sale for 3 seasons.
As far as the LS1 vs other engines... the LS1 and its variations are in more vehicles than anything else on the road by far. I think having millions of cars in many different set-ups with perhaps billions of miles on the clock and only slight problems is a testament to the engine's reliability.
Pushed, it's still a bit weaker than the Cobra DOHC 4.6L (but not by much, considering the Ford motor is forged) and a lot weaker than the 2JZ-GTE of the Supra in theory. But, the 2JZ-GTE is not as common and most people don't push 25+ psi through them all the time. They are mostly dyno queens setup to make huge numbers on race gas. The average guy uses 93 and pushes 500-600rwhp on those big laggy single turbos, so that's not out of reach of the LS1.
Last edited by JakeFusion; May 5, 2006 at 09:58 PM.
The Supra can handle over 900whp on the stock bottom end, which is still more then the LS1.
Man, I want a Poopra.
Didn't Harlan run low 8s with the stock crank? He had to be making in excess of 1000rwhp. 




