228r, AFR heads, LS7 clutch results
07-12-2006, 12:30 AM
#21
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
MSGHUFF look at the numbers in your sig. Isnt that what he should be expecting? OR are those fake
And my track times, more importantly my MPH, backs up my Dyno numbers
Last edited by MSGHUFF; 07-12-2006 at 12:50 AM.
07-12-2006, 08:28 AM
#23
Teching In
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
So you dont think there is a difference between a dynojet and a mustang dyno. That is what your saying. I cant help you there. There is a difference but if you dont believe it what can I say. Do some more research. All of the guys who race who saw my car on the dyno figured 11 teens.
Good luck getting your car fixed.
07-12-2006, 11:31 AM
#24
TECH Senior Member
On a simple HP calc (by no means accurate) according to your trap (108), you would be around 4100lbs weight and 403 rwhp. Something doesn't jive here or something is not right in the car.
BTW, Blanco, since you have a dyno graph then do not correct.
Just state the dyno used. Say 405/38x on mustang dyno.
Bottom line, you have some of the best parts and I'm sure you'll work the bugs out. It is definately a good power making setup.
BTW, Blanco, since you have a dyno graph then do not correct.
Just state the dyno used. Say 405/38x on mustang dyno.
Bottom line, you have some of the best parts and I'm sure you'll work the bugs out. It is definately a good power making setup.
07-12-2006, 01:11 PM
#26
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
It was running fine and now its not so yes there is something wrong with it. No its not in the tune, I really dont think anyway. They just dont "drop" a tune for no reason with a computer doing all the managing. The dyno was on Feb 15th. It is safe to assume something could have happened from then to now.
As far as all the BS I tried to say I would expect more and he said anyone saying they had more was fantasy. Thats how I read that. So I went from there trying to prove there is more potential in that setup due to what my car did with its setup. I dont expect the numbers to be identical but I honestly think there will be more than what he stated.
Pred I use the conversion because thats what others do and its been an accepted fact. Its hard to explain the difference between dynos to some people. I'm willing to bet that on the dyno its still puts out the same number. I race from a roll without any issues. I'm in 3rd gear at the time as well. I believe what ever the trouble is lies in the take off. Maybe the clutch is feked, or the way it engages and dis-engages. Dont know but it totally sucks. My car should be in the 11's n/a and 10 on the juice. And no I'm not spraying with it not running right.
Anway good luck to Phil, I think he will be pleasantly surprised by his combo.
As far as all the BS I tried to say I would expect more and he said anyone saying they had more was fantasy. Thats how I read that. So I went from there trying to prove there is more potential in that setup due to what my car did with its setup. I dont expect the numbers to be identical but I honestly think there will be more than what he stated.
Pred I use the conversion because thats what others do and its been an accepted fact. Its hard to explain the difference between dynos to some people. I'm willing to bet that on the dyno its still puts out the same number. I race from a roll without any issues. I'm in 3rd gear at the time as well. I believe what ever the trouble is lies in the take off. Maybe the clutch is feked, or the way it engages and dis-engages. Dont know but it totally sucks. My car should be in the 11's n/a and 10 on the juice. And no I'm not spraying with it not running right.
Anway good luck to Phil, I think he will be pleasantly surprised by his combo.
Once I was able to optimize SCR/DCR I was able to trap 122>123 and I was putting down ~429 rwhp/404 rwtrq, just to give an idea what those numbers can trap at. (dunno DA but it is sea level, ie not that high).
In brief, from worst to best 119mph>123mph
07-12-2006, 01:15 PM
#27
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
I had a similar setup last year as yours, same heads, but with a 224/220 and A4, same gears.
Once I was able to optimize SCR/DCR I was able to trap 122>123 and I was putting down ~429 rwhp/404 rwtrq, just to give an idea what those numbers can trap at. (dunno DA but it is sea level, ie not that high).
In brief, from worst to best 119mph>123mph
Once I was able to optimize SCR/DCR I was able to trap 122>123 and I was putting down ~429 rwhp/404 rwtrq, just to give an idea what those numbers can trap at. (dunno DA but it is sea level, ie not that high).
In brief, from worst to best 119mph>123mph
