436 WHP Edelbrock/Lingenfelter Heads and Comp Cam Package
10-18-2006, 04:38 PM
#21
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonsny
We will be roundtabling on a larger port version at SEMA. Any preference?
Valve Size?
Chamber Volume?
Ideal CID range?
Port Volume?
Springs?
Valve Size?
Chamber Volume?
Ideal CID range?
Port Volume?
Springs?
1. 2.04/1.57
2. 61cc
3. 346-up
4. 215cc
5. DBL Gold good for .660 lift
Oh wait, I already have all of those.
10-18-2006, 05:03 PM
#22
offset intake valves to allow for bigger valves like the ls7 heads would be nice. Of course we'd need the actual rockers to match. What would be even better would to have the LS7 rockers just bolt right up so we have the option 
The specific questions could probably be best answered in the forced induction area. I'm sure they'd be able to draft out a great head with the experience over there. What I'm thinking would be nice is a cubic inch range of 346 - 370. Intake port volume of around mid 230's. Chamber volume of around 69-70. Intake valve of around 2.05-2.08 and exhaust valve of around 1.6. Springs would have to be pretty beefy. Something like the 921's would be nice.
The specific questions could probably be best answered in the forced induction area. I'm sure they'd be able to draft out a great head with the experience over there. What I'm thinking would be nice is a cubic inch range of 346 - 370. Intake port volume of around mid 230's. Chamber volume of around 69-70. Intake valve of around 2.05-2.08 and exhaust valve of around 1.6. Springs would have to be pretty beefy. Something like the 921's would be nice.
10-18-2006, 06:24 PM
#24
Jason great to see more of these heads getting out on the market, they are a top notch piece, these heads deliver results, and back up the flow numbers when independently tested, unlike alot of other companies products, that vette has alot left in it with that rich air fuel ratio
good work Edelbrock
good work Edelbrock
