Got the heads and cam dynoed today...
Those TQ numbers are lookin good! Nice numbers all the way around..definitely som emore hp to be found in that combo. You gonna track test it too?
Also looks like your PCM was still learning your new combo by the way it picked up power little by little every run.
You didn't happen to reset the computer before you dynoed or not get any hard WOT runs on it, did you? <img src="images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">
[ November 26, 2001: Message edited by: Smoke_ur_5.0 ]</p>
You didn't happen to reset the computer before you dynoed or not get any hard WOT runs on it, did you? <img src="images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">
[ November 26, 2001: Message edited by: Smoke_ur_5.0 ]</p>
[quote]Originally posted by TrahnZam WS6:
<strong>
Even though my car is far from optimal tuning for the new heads&cam, I have still gained 20 rwhp and 33 rwtq. I expect a decent gain in power once I get my fuel and timing figured out. Right now I am shooting for 430+/415
<img src="images/icons/cool.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
I just thought I'd throw out that the #'s he's reporting is peak. I'd love to see the avg. #'s prior to the heads/cam setup. That torque is phenomenal! 430 RWHP should be well within reach. Timing alone should get you very close. Congrats on an awesome setup.
<strong>
Even though my car is far from optimal tuning for the new heads&cam, I have still gained 20 rwhp and 33 rwtq. I expect a decent gain in power once I get my fuel and timing figured out. Right now I am shooting for 430+/415
<img src="images/icons/cool.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
I just thought I'd throw out that the #'s he's reporting is peak. I'd love to see the avg. #'s prior to the heads/cam setup. That torque is phenomenal! 430 RWHP should be well within reach. Timing alone should get you very close. Congrats on an awesome setup.
Ill have to check when I get back home and find my old b1 cam dyno sheet, but in some instances I have a 30 rwhp gain and a 35 rwtq gain with the car so out of tune. Has anyone else witnessed the rpm where the horsepower peaks shift when timing is added? I am guessing my 223/223 should peak higher than my B1, so I wonder if adding timing will push it from 5700 rpms to 6300 rpms where I wanted it when I spec'd out the cam.
[ November 26, 2001: Message edited by: TrahnZam WS6 ]</p>
[ November 26, 2001: Message edited by: TrahnZam WS6 ]</p>
[quote]Originally posted by Jason99T/A:
<strong>Nick, what valvespring are you using now?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I am using 918 springs with Ti stock-sized retainers ( <img src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" /> <img src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" /> ) <img src="images/icons/smile.gif" border="0">
So far so good, looks like the 918 is the single spring we have all been waiting for!
<strong>Nick, what valvespring are you using now?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I am using 918 springs with Ti stock-sized retainers ( <img src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" /> <img src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" /> ) <img src="images/icons/smile.gif" border="0">
So far so good, looks like the 918 is the single spring we have all been waiting for!





