thermostat
Honestly though, I prefer 180 stats if you’re going to ever drive the car in temps under 50 degrees. It’s not just about water boiling off, but about heating up the oil enough to flow properly and getting all internal components heated properly to meet clearance specs. There is less friction in hotter oil, but more power in cooler engine temps, so it’s good to find a happy medium.
I was gonna put it on my Wife's car, but changed my mind.
So does a 160 thermostat come close/meet that happy medium with an LT1 engine??? I've got the stock water pump and all.... the 160 sure seems to be a popular choice, but just cause everybody else uses it doesn't persuade me <img src="gr_sad.gif" border="0"> I rarely drive in the winter when it's cold... perhaps the coldest weather i drive in is 40 degrees and only a couple times a year. my car gets stored in the winter. Did your 180 make a significant difference in engine temps?

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
BUT one thing to think about is water pump uses less power if thermosat is open when making hi rpm passes! That could explain gains with 160 thermo. Also synthetic oil should offset wear potential of colder thermo. <img src="graemlins/gr_xmas.gif" border="0" alt="[santa]" />








