My DCR Calculator - If you have a Comp grind, it doesn't get any easier than this...
#22
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 98camaroLS1M6
How do you adjust for .090flycut pistons?
#23
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by chris93266
Maybe i'm an idiot, but I cannot get this to work. I have a tsp 233/239 .595/.603 cam. I think comp grinds the cams for tsp. Which even values should I use? How do I find my grind?
#25
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by chris93266
thanks, how do i find out the advance?
#30
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ChevyChad
So clarify something for me- if I get my deck height milled .006 then the new deck height would be 0 then?
#32
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The cam I designed has me at an 8.21:1 DCR straight up and 8:28:1 1 degree advanced. From what I have read, that's good for a pump gas engine. What I'm curious about now is... what is my DCR for my stock cam? '98 LS1, if anyone knows the specs and can compute it for me.
#34
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Try pluging in a Comp LSK 2135 intake / 2135 exhaust on a 114 + 2.
4.160 bore, 4.125 stroke, 6.125 rod, 73cc chamber, 0.051" gasket, 4.185" gasket bore, 2cc piston, -.004" deck. Your sheet and KB differ quite a bit. Any idea why?
4.160 bore, 4.125 stroke, 6.125 rod, 73cc chamber, 0.051" gasket, 4.185" gasket bore, 2cc piston, -.004" deck. Your sheet and KB differ quite a bit. Any idea why?
Last edited by mikey; 12-28-2006 at 08:20 PM.
#35
TECH Regular
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks like the new 402 setup should be at 11.97SCR and 8.89DCR
Comment: you should note the proper units for each measurement as they are mixed usually due to everything being SAE except for piston dish/dome and combustion chamber size. Also stick the quench thickness value in as well.
Comment: you should note the proper units for each measurement as they are mixed usually due to everything being SAE except for piston dish/dome and combustion chamber size. Also stick the quench thickness value in as well.
#37
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mikey
Try pluging in a Comp LSK 2135 intake / 2135 exhaust on a 114 + 2.
4.160 bore, 4.125 stroke, 6.125 rod, 73cc chamber, 0.051" gasket, 4.185" gasket bore, 2cc piston, -.004" deck. Your sheet and KB differ quite a bit. Any idea why?
4.160 bore, 4.125 stroke, 6.125 rod, 73cc chamber, 0.051" gasket, 4.185" gasket bore, 2cc piston, -.004" deck. Your sheet and KB differ quite a bit. Any idea why?
![](http://www.alantripp.com/mikey1.jpg)
![](http://www.alantripp.com/mikey2.jpg)
Last edited by pianoprodigy; 12-28-2006 at 10:00 PM.
#38
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ChevyChad
Sweet tool. I was going to make my own, but now I don't have to
woot!
So clarify something for me- if I get my deck height milled .006 then the new deck height would be 0 then?
Thanks again to all those that helped on this!![Driving](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_driving3.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
So clarify something for me- if I get my deck height milled .006 then the new deck height would be 0 then?
Thanks again to all those that helped on this!
![Driving](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_driving3.gif)
Or, are you talking about milling your heads? If so, it seems the rule of thumb is .006 for 1 cc of chamber volume.
#39
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Other threads here indicate the LSK lobes have a more aggressive ramp rate than the XFI lobes. Yet your Lobe Source sheet indicates the XFI's are a variable 49-52* difference while the LSK's are a static 49* difference between .006 & .050. The X-ER's .050 duration on the same sheet are all '0.006 duration + 49', also. Don't the different series have different ramp rates?
Try using ISNA() to drop the #N/A's, btw.
Try using ISNA() to drop the #N/A's, btw.