Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what is the difference between rod lengths?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2006, 08:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
half-n-half's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Merrillville,In (chicago)
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default what is the difference between rod lengths?

ok, i understand it is the length of the rod...but is there anything gained or lost by using a 6.125 instead of a 6.098?

why do they make pistons to accommodate both?

the reason i ask is because i have forged pistons that are going into a forged 347 i am building and i need 6.125 so the question popped in my head.

Thanks
Louie
Old 12-31-2006, 10:29 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

There was a discussion on this a while back. I wish I could remember exactly what the reasoning was, but I believe the shorter rod is the best route. I forget why though. Try doing a search in the advanced section.
Old 12-31-2006, 11:13 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jeremiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mustang, Ok
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have allways been told the longer rod you can get in there the better. The longer rod will allow the piston to dwell at TDC slightly longer allowing more air/fuel to be pulled into the chamber. This action also is supposed to put less stress on the cylender walls and the rod/piston itself.

This is what I have been told years ago, does it hold water?
Old 12-31-2006, 12:41 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The longer rod you can get in the better mostly, there are always exceptions though. The major benefit to a long rod is that it keeps piston speed lower compared to a short rod at the same time. I also forgot to mention there is less side loading on the rod with a longer rod, Jeremiah touched on that slightly.
Old 12-31-2006, 01:04 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
98cammedz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i always believed that the longer rod did make the piston dwell at tdc for a degree or two at most i believe. But not to pull in air/fuel mixture but the combustion pressure will be slightly higher before the piston is pushed back down on power stroke thus creating some more HP. just what i believe. but rod length is something that should be considered in the whole package of what you want to do with this engine.

just my two cents

Ryan
Old 12-31-2006, 01:12 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
tahoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Take a look at this:

http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htm

It tells you a lot on the rod length subject.

I would rather use a shorter rod, if that is what it take to make room for the piston rings, oil ring in particular.
I am talking street DD aplication here.


Br//




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.