how about these headers?
02-22-2002, 04:15 PM
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waxahachie, TEXAS
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how about these headers? 
a special F-U to IRS for trying to disable right clicking to get the URL of the image... <img src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" border="0">
02-22-2002, 04:46 PM
#4
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waxahachie, TEXAS
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: how about these headers? [quote]Originally posted by 4mulaJoe:
<strong>They suck!!!
Stock manifolds are just as good. There doesn't seemt o be a cheap deal for ls1 headers. You gotta spend the $$</strong><hr></blockquote>
thanks for the heads up.
<strong>They suck!!!
Stock manifolds are just as good. There doesn't seemt o be a cheap deal for ls1 headers. You gotta spend the $$</strong><hr></blockquote>
thanks for the heads up.
02-23-2002, 03:01 AM
#6
Re: how about these headers? Yeah, those are just regular SBC headers.
Regardless, the Hooker shorties are not much better than stock (they are also 1 5/8 primaries, 2.25" collectors). It's not even the price issue, it's the hassle of installing headers for very minimal gains. When I get headers, I'm getting LTs and never doing it again <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
Here's the LS1 headers btw.
Dope
Regardless, the Hooker shorties are not much better than stock (they are also 1 5/8 primaries, 2.25" collectors). It's not even the price issue, it's the hassle of installing headers for very minimal gains. When I get headers, I'm getting LTs and never doing it again <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
Here's the LS1 headers btw.
Dope