heads question for all you pros!!!!!!!!!!
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ok guys,
will someone explain the the pros and cons of 2.02 valves and 2.055 valves im confused.but i at least know the 2.055 vales are bigger.is bigger always better.any help would be great!!!
thanks
wayne
[ March 06, 2002: Message edited by: 2000Z28 ]</p>
will someone explain the the pros and cons of 2.02 valves and 2.055 valves im confused.but i at least know the 2.055 vales are bigger.is bigger always better.any help would be great!!!
thanks
wayne
[ March 06, 2002: Message edited by: 2000Z28 ]</p>
#3
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As far as performance goes, you will hear arguments on both sides, bigger is better, and smaller is better.
Personally I went with the bigger valves because I knew a stroker/bore bottom end was in my future and I didn't want to have to redo the heads when it was time to do that. The performance of my 2.08/1.60 valves in my ARE Stage II heads was excellent on the stock bottom end.
Personally I went with the bigger valves because I knew a stroker/bore bottom end was in my future and I didn't want to have to redo the heads when it was time to do that. The performance of my 2.08/1.60 valves in my ARE Stage II heads was excellent on the stock bottom end.