Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ah Oh, another cam "?"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2002 | 05:45 PM
  #1  
May Spin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default Ah Oh, another cam "?"

Just to let you know, I have read Raughammer's page (4 times), ls1info (3 times), and have used search to many times to count. I have got two pages of hand writen notes, so finally I need your help summarizing.

Need to pass CA sniffer (on a 00 M6), so I narrowed it down to...

MMS 218/218 .561 on 114lsa (safe) or...
B1 221/221 .558 on 114lsa

With stock heads (with valvetrain upgraded).

Q. Between the two, from 4000rpm+ what do you think the power under the curve difference will be?

Q. At what rpm will both peak at?

Q. What do you think the hp difference will be at 6400rpm?

Thanks to all who can help.

Scott. 00 WS6 M6.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2002 | 10:42 PM
  #2  
TrahnZam WS6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Houston / Dallas
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

Jeez thats an easy one, go with the B1 for sure! I had no real complaints about it in my car (before I swapped it out for a more aggressive cam).
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 02:24 AM
  #3  
May Spin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

I figured someone would immediately jump on the B1 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> , I wanted to get the answers to my questions inorder to see what I would be leaving on the table if I went safe with the 218.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 08:01 AM
  #4  
TA_2001's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 712
Likes: 1
From: Dallas,Texas
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

b1..

I dont like the huge lift of the other cam.

just my opinion

Terry
ls1info.com
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 02:37 PM
  #5  
May Spin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

Come on guys, help me out here. Educated guesses welcome.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #6  
Reboot's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

MMS 218 cam and stock heads on an A4 with converter unlocked (no dyno tricks).

362 RWHP
373 RWTQ

Made power all the way up to 6500
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 12:32 AM
  #7  
May Spin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Reboot:
<strong>MMS 218 cam and stock heads on an A4 with converter unlocked (no dyno tricks).

362 RWHP
373 RWTQ

Made power all the way up to 6500</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's some nice #'s on a A4. I'm trying to figure out how much of a difference there will be between the MMS 218 and the B1.

What was the deciding factor when you chose the MMS 218 over other cams in that range?

Did Ralph install those for you?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 07:43 AM
  #8  
Freak's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln Park Mi
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by TA_2001:
<strong>b1..

I dont like the huge lift of the other cam.

just my opinion

Terry
ls1info.com</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Huge lift? its only .003 inches higher lift than the B1 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 11:45 AM
  #9  
CHRISPY's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 1
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

LOL Freak I was going to post the same thing. I would DEFINITELY go B1. I passed emissions very easily with that cam.
Cheers,
Chris
ps- The ultimate IMO is the XE-R 224/224 114LSA .581 lift cam. I am pretty sure you would pass emissions in that too.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
Reboot's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by May Spin:
<strong>[QUOTE]Originally posted by Reboot:
[qb]What was the deciding factor when you chose the MMS 218 over other cams in that range?

Did Ralph install those for you?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I chose the 218 because It's my daily driver and I wimped out of installing a bigger cam for fear of TC lockup problems.

Ralph did the install and dyno. He's the only one that has ever worked on my car.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 07:37 PM
  #11  
99RedHawk's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

Since noone took a guess at the difference, I will. I would guess a 5 to 7 RWHP difference betwen the 218 and the B1.This is from all the dynos I have seen on different cams . I would also go with he B1,because it will pass and we always want more later..

Brooke= original B1 cam <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 08:45 PM
  #12  
May Spin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

Reboot, thanks for the info.

99RedHawk, thanks for taking a guess. I figured bewteen 5-10rwhp.

My main concern is not wanting to rev to high, thats why I was looking at the MMS 218, however If my memory serves me correctly, Rebbot was going to need to shift around 6600 (Reboot, plaese correct me if I'm wrong). That seems awfully high for such a small cam with stock heads. Let alone adding S2's down the road.

Just trying to figure these two cams out.

Any more comments?

TIA. Scott. 00 WS6 M6.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 09:02 PM
  #13  
DanZ28's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
From: Cali/Bay Area
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

I wish Reboot would of posted his before cam #'s so you could get an idea of how much he gained from just the 218 cam swap, it was pretty impressive..Don't know why everyone want's to jump on the B1 band wagon unless that's what your personally using or used. There is also the TR220/561 cam to consider as well. I think your pushing it if you use anything passed a 221 duration if you want to pass Cali Smog IMO. I'm curious if anyone has passed with a 224 duration myself..
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #14  
Reboot's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

311 RWHP
347 RWTQ

Pre cam and maybe pulley (I'm not sure if I had it then)
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 01:03 AM
  #15  
May Spin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

DanZ28, I agree 221 is the limit you want to go safely on stock cubes here in cali.

There is no doubt Reboot has made nice gains with the MMS 218, I would have thought that cam would have fallen flat on it's face above 6200rpm. I guess it doesn't.

Now, if I'm going to have to shift around 6600rppm with either cam, I might as well go B1 and gain a few ponies across the range. And may even respond better to S2's down the road.

Reboot, any track times yet, before/after? If not hopefully soon. I bet you're curious as I am.

<small>[ March 20, 2002, 01:05 AM: Message edited by: May Spin ]</small>
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 01:53 AM
  #16  
Jantzer98SS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
From: Grants Pass, OR
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

I've seen 400RWHP with the MMS218 cam, if you're worried about smog it'll be a good choice. Who would know better about passing Cali smog than MMS?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 08:33 AM
  #17  
Reboot's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default Re: Ah Oh, another cam "?"

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by May Spin:
<strong>DanZ28, I agree 221 is the limit you want to go safely on stock cubes here in cali.

There is no doubt Reboot has made nice gains with the MMS 218, I would have thought that cam would have fallen flat on it's face above 6200rpm. I guess it doesn't.

Now, if I'm going to have to shift around 6600rppm with either cam, I might as well go B1 and gain a few ponies across the range. And may even respond better to S2's down the road.

Reboot, any track times yet, before/after? If not hopefully soon. I bet you're curious as I am.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The before numbers are in my sig, unfortunatly I blew my tranny one day after my cam was installed. My FLP Level IV tranny just arrived yesterday and should be installed today. I hope to have new #'s this weekend if the weather cooperates.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.