ZO6 or port LS1 HEAds
<small>[ March 27, 2002, 08:15 PM: Message edited by: 11SECSS ]</small>
just trying to get my car to run 11.0 on the motor and keep it a daily driver .
<small>[ March 28, 2002, 06:12 PM: Message edited by: 11SECSS ]</small>
Trending Topics
<small>[ March 29, 2002, 10:54 AM: Message edited by: George C. ]</small>
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I don't think I could have made those numbers with any LS1 ported head.
Just my .02
Dan
I'm getting ready to get some flow numbers on stock LS1/6.0L intake/exaust ports. I'll let you know soon.
.200"=156cfm
.300"=204
.350"=225
.400"=243
.450"=257
.500"268
.550"=275
.600"=278
These results were given to me by another member, but I still need to know the port volume(in cc's) for the LS6 head, and a stage one head.
I think everyone agrees the ported LS1 casting is the hands down winner here.
11SECSS, as far as the downtime and waiting for your heads to be ported, it really wouldn't be an issue. You can order a set of ported heads from pretty much any vendor, and pay a core charge up front. When you get the ported heads, you swap them out and send your stock ones back and the core charge is refunded to you...
1. LS6 ported (new valves etc.) 10.5:1 compression
2. 6.0 Ported heads (new valves etc.) 9.5:1 compression?
3. LS1 ported heads (new valves etc.) 10.1:1 compression
4. LS6 heads stock
5. 6.0 liter truck heads stock
6. LS1 heads stock
Does this sound right guys? Am I missing something? Is the compression ratio right?
Good NA car or a power adder car should be considered. I went with the truck heads since I want a lower compression ratio starting point as I am a Turbocharged car.
A wild azz NA car might want the LS6 heads with milling included to increase the CR even further.
Clearly if I had to choose between LS1 ported heads and LS6 stock heads I would go with LS1 route.
<small>[ April 02, 2002, 03:22 PM: Message edited by: 11SECSS ]</small>






