382 all bore guys............
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: land of the 4" bore.
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
what cams are you guys running? I was wondering what was the biggest cam in an all bored 382 motor is? I currently have a 230/237 .544/.544 114
how many with R1 cams? anyone with a much bigger cam? Anybody have a 237/242 114 cam? <img border="0" alt="[angel]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_angel.gif" />
how many with R1 cams? anyone with a much bigger cam? Anybody have a 237/242 114 cam? <img border="0" alt="[angel]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_angel.gif" />
#2
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Take a wild guess!!
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am running a MTI 382 All-Bore with LS6heads and the R1 cam!! <img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" />
#4
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the cam you have is pretty good. The R1 really works well in those all-bore motors.
Don't get crazy with those huge exhaust durations, they really don't help much. Notice how well Thunder Racing's reverse-split patterns are doing?
I started with the T1 (221/221 .558 112) on my 382ci and it pulled 455 rwhp/442 ft-lbs with the stock rearend. Swapped to the T2 (232/232 .574 112) and pulled the same numbers thru the new 12-bolt/4.10 combo. I figure it was worth about 10 rwhp over the T1.
Tony
Don't get crazy with those huge exhaust durations, they really don't help much. Notice how well Thunder Racing's reverse-split patterns are doing?
I started with the T1 (221/221 .558 112) on my 382ci and it pulled 455 rwhp/442 ft-lbs with the stock rearend. Swapped to the T2 (232/232 .574 112) and pulled the same numbers thru the new 12-bolt/4.10 combo. I figure it was worth about 10 rwhp over the T1.
Tony
#5
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cali
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i am on 370ci and running on R1 232/237 561/561 112. works fine, very strong top end but its 12 to 1 ratio
<small>[ May 24, 2002, 02:53 PM: Message edited by: badls1 ]</small>
<small>[ May 24, 2002, 02:53 PM: Message edited by: badls1 ]</small>
#7
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Two ways to create a 382ci LS1:
1. Stock bore/block with a 4.00" stroker crank
2. Resleeved/bored block with 4.10" bore size and stock crank.
Stock bore is 3.90" diameter.
Stock crank is 3.62"
MTI has also produced an all-bore 393ci setup and it is being tested in SW's Corvette. This uses the same 4.155" bore as my 434ci (I have a 4.00" stroker crank).
Tony
1. Stock bore/block with a 4.00" stroker crank
2. Resleeved/bored block with 4.10" bore size and stock crank.
Stock bore is 3.90" diameter.
Stock crank is 3.62"
MTI has also produced an all-bore 393ci setup and it is being tested in SW's Corvette. This uses the same 4.155" bore as my 434ci (I have a 4.00" stroker crank).
Tony
Trending Topics
#8
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kenly NC, USA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks NineBall.Not to jack the thread but I hear and read(a little)about SW's car.Is there a site were I can learn more about his cars?
BadLS1 How is your 370?What crank or bore was used? Thanks guys. <img border="0" alt="[pimp]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_pimp.gif" />
BadLS1 How is your 370?What crank or bore was used? Thanks guys. <img border="0" alt="[pimp]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_pimp.gif" />
#9
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Magee MS
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Someone else built a 393 and it was in a Silver z28. I think it might have been ARE( I may be wrong) But that car made some great numbers. I saw this car in a magazine article. I'll see if I can dig up some info on it.
Josh S.
Josh S.
#10
TECH Addict
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nawf Carolina
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That car would be cendres' 98 Z28, ARE built the engine. It was a 393 with a solid roller cam, resleeved to 4.10 bore with an offset ground stock crank.
J.
J.
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: land of the 4" bore.
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Crazyquik:
<strong>That car would be cendres' 98 Z28, ARE built the engine. It was a 393 with a solid roller cam, resleeved to 4.10 bore with an offset ground stock crank.
J.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">DITTO! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />
<strong>That car would be cendres' 98 Z28, ARE built the engine. It was a 393 with a solid roller cam, resleeved to 4.10 bore with an offset ground stock crank.
J.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">DITTO! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />
#12
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bringing this one back from the dead. Looking for a bigger cam to drop into my all bore. Currently running a 229 cam. Any suggestions? Also stepping up to 1 7/8 headers and 3.5" collectors. Currently running Stg III 6.0L heads and 11.2:1 compression. Noticed that the MTI R1 cam is backwards according to the current logic. Seems like according to the current trend we should flip it around and make it a 237/232 cam. What was the initial logic behind the larger exhaust duration on the R1?
#13
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cali
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
well i am runing on stock stroke, re sleeved block. its on 4.020 now. i wanted a engien with less then 380 to have less friction and rev a bit high. but on the same sleeves i could punch out another .040 if i want to. but not needed for now. its acually 368 cubs. depends what gasket i might use i could play around from 11.5 to 12 to 1 on the comp.