Max lift and duration with a stock head & piston
Assuming a stock head and piston, does anyone have a rough idea as to the max duration and max lift with the cam installed straight up would be.
This would help..... People who have installed some of the cams should know whether in their instance if piston to valve clearance became an issue...
Thanks again to all who have responded and to all who will respond to this modified question.
Most any cam out there on the market will work with stock heads without worry of PV clearance.
I'd be concerned when you start exceeding 230 duration on the intake side.
Again... thanks...
Thanks again...
<strong> FWIW I'm going 232/232 .574/.574 112 with 5.3 heads milled .040 and 2.02 intake valves. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Don't you have to wait until fall? Isn't that the start of Moose hunting season? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Thunder thinks so) so they are planning on measuring it since it pertains to what happens if the heads are milled <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
If the 230 is getting close but OK with stock heads.... how about when heads are changed to say one of the aftermarket stage 1,2,3 heads. Do they retain a stock valve to piston clearance.. or are they more like a head that has been slightly milled?
Thanks for your help.. it is enlightening and has given me a direction to pursue for my future cam.
Trending Topics
<strong>Thanks again Fireball.... for clearing that up.
If the 230 is getting close but OK with stock heads.... how about when heads are changed to say one of the aftermarket stage 1,2,3 heads. Do they retain a stock valve to piston clearance.. or are they more like a head that has been slightly milled?
Thanks for your help.. it is enlightening and has given me a direction to pursue for my future cam.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thats where the concern lies. They are working on getting it measured soon. There are 2 factors to be concerned about with aftermarket heads:
1) bigger valves (puts the edge closer to the pistons)
2) milled bottoms (puts the valves closer to the pistons)
FWIW I'm going 232/232 .574/.574 112 with 5.3 heads milled .040 and 2.02 intake valves. I'm 99.9% sure my new setup will have some PV clearance issues on the intake side so I bought the isky flycutting tool to make some man-made reliefs <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fireball:
<strong> FWIW I'm going 232/232 .574/.574 112 with 5.3 heads milled .040 and 2.02 intake valves. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Don't you have to wait until fall? Isn't that the start of Moose hunting season? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">LOL thats funny stuff. he must be poching.lol
Just to through this out there since it was said that the TR 230/224 cam was pushing the envelope on P/V clearance. What about the new MTI X1 cam, it is also a 230 duration cam, but with .591 lift on the intake side, with S2 heads as well, which I would assume are milled slightly........
Any thoughts on that.......
Thats where the concern lies. They are working on getting it measured soon. There are 2 factors to be concerned about with aftermarket heads:
1) bigger valves (puts the edge closer to the pistons)
2) milled bottoms (puts the valves closer to the pistons)
FWIW I'm going 232/232 .574/.574 112 with 5.3 heads milled .040 and 2.02 intake valves. I'm 99.9% sure my new setup will have some PV clearance issues on the intake side so I bought the isky flycutting tool to make some man-made reliefs <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> [/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The milling is MUCH bigger of an issue than the larger valves. This is because milling is a direct amount putting the valves closer to the pistons whereas the increase in valve size only minimally reduces the clearance.
Since the valves are at a 15 degree angle and you are increasing valve size 0.010 per side of each valve, sin15*(0.010") = 0.00259" decrease in clearance vs. the 0.040" decrease in clearance due to the milling, all things being equal.
<strong>Any new updates?? Has Thunder checked the clearences?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The results were posted here:
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c;f=1;t=005477



