Reverse split vs single pattern vs split?
Some people use more duration on the intake side than exhaust to crutch a poor flowing intake port or intake manifold or restrictor plate. Exhaust is under a lot of pressure and like 1800 degrees though so it works a little differently.
Short track roundy rounders have used reverse split cams in 2 barrel carb classes for at least 20 years.
I'm not sold on them yet for LS1s. Remember that changing the intake port flow to exhaust port flow ratio with ported heads will effect what cam works bestest.
J.
With the reverse split cams you have more duration, so that the intake valves stay open (for a longer duration), thereby compensating for restrictive flow of the stock intake ports?
<strong>So...
With the reverse split cams you have more duration, so that the intake valves stay open (for a longer duration), thereby compensating for restrictive flow of the stock intake ports?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sounds exactly right to me, but just like crazyquik, I'm not sold on them yet either, I'd rather stay traditional. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
My buddy just installed the new TR230/224 cam two days ago. It really woke that car up. Gonna get it tuned and see some dyno results soon. He's thinkin about a ATI D-1SC to put on top of that. So, how would this reverse pattern cam/ATI procharger combo add up? Any benefits over a single pattern, or regular split duration?
Miah
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Some of these new cams aren't really that big. The 230 Thunder Racing lobe has less advertised duration than the good ole trusty T1. I dont know about the duration on the MMS 229 though.
J.
However blowers like LSA around 114LSA or the combustion charge can be pushed out past the exhaust valve or into the header itself!! (Bad news) I would like to see a TR 230/230 110 or 111LSA cam dyno in Jasons car to compare against the reverse split cam.
Cheers,
Chris
<small>[ June 12, 2002, 10:18 AM: Message edited by: Chris ARE 360 ]</small>
(2) S/E cars can play with duration. Cannot run ported heads. So are they probably running reverse split cams?
(3) Reverse split LIFT vs DURATION cams, thoughts? I had a reverse split LIFT cam last year, Comp 585/560 lift.
<strong>(1) So if the reverse split cams are compensating for our stock intake restrictions, does that mean if you go with ported heads and bigger valves that a split cam starts to loose it's value?
(2) S/E cars can play with duration. Cannot run ported heads. So are they probably running reverse split cams?
(3) Reverse split LIFT vs DURATION cams, thoughts? I had a reverse split LIFT cam last year, Comp 585/560 lift.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">1) No, from an engineering standpoint, ported heads would make the intake even more of a bottleneck.
2) S/E are running reverse split cams to the best of my knowledge, with stock lift specs, even though they grind the cams so aggressively that they result in controlled valve float, effectively increasing lift. Cheaters! <img border="0" alt="[devil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
3) Split lift just means you are changing the ramp profile of the lobes, making the exhuast ramp less aggressive.
I recently installed a BIG reverse split cam (230+, 110 LSA). The butt-dyno says holy ****!, but I need to fix my 02 issue before I tune or redyno.
EDIT - Thanks Spelling **** Vince.
<small>[ June 12, 2002, 12:01 PM: Message edited by: TrahnZam WS6 ]</small>
Why is the tq lower with a reverse pattern than single pattern and split pattern?



