Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is my bottom end in jeopardy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
nomorews6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS!!!
Default Is my bottom end in jeopardy?

I am planning on having my approx. 420rwhp 39k stock bottom ended motor sprayed with 150 shot or so - is this too much? I'll be shifting at around 6500-6600 rpm's.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
Jimbo'sZO6's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Be careful with that one! Good friend of mine with virtually the same H/C package as my car toasted the #7 piston spraying a 150 dry shot and his motor only had 15k miles at the time. Car did run mid 10's at 128+ on ET streets and skinnies before it let go. The hypereutectic pistons in these motors don't take big shots shots of juice for very long. I would stick with a 100 shot until you forge the bottom end. HTH

Jimbo
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
MavrikTA's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Texas....thank God.
Default

The biggest contributor to your buddy's problem was probably the 150 DRY shot.
A 150 wet should be ok.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
ls1muscle's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

Why do you say that? In my opinion, dry is safer then wet. You do have to buy more fuel products though.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
Blown2000SS's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

i wouldnt. your asking for problems.

100 on top of 400whp is pletnty
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #6  
MavrikTA's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Texas....thank God.
Default

I dont see how anyone could possibley believe that a dry shot, ESPECIALLY that LARGE, is safer than a wet. No offense. But really, there is a reason you hardly ever see anyone sprayin a dry shot over 100.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #7  
ls1muscle's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

Oh boy this is going to turn into a dry vs. wet thread. Wet being more reliable then dry? thats rediculous.. That's a misconception by alot of people, the reason you see alot more people running wet is because its cheaper and you can set it up really easily, whereas on a dry shot you can't just slap it on there and spray it. On the dry, you just have to do more steps, you will spend more $$ for the fuel and set the tune correctly. I guarantee you there is alot more failures with the noids sticking on wet, what are you gonna say causes a failure with the dry system? the MAF? Thats stupid.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #8  
sidewayz28's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 1
From: seattle
Default

i say screw wet/dry go direct port!
once my car is tuned i should be making ~420rwhp and im going to be spraying 120 shot through an NXL. im just making sure i get every safety device i can get, and im upgrading my fuel pump/injectors.. most importantly getting it tuned!!!
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #9  
MavrikTA's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Texas....thank God.
Default

Whatever dude. I aint hyjacking this dudes thread. Just bear in mind a MAF only has so much "adjustment" room.....proof evident in the fact that our cars are still in need of tunes after intake/exhaust mods in order to obtain equal A/Fs to what they were before. And thats only a 20hp difference. Do the math on 150...
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.