Dissapoined after mods
Doesn't sound right to me, G-mafs, regardless of their lack of merits or their merits don't make sense on a tuned car, you just tune around all that, get a truck MAF, bigger, cheaper, same flow.
<strong>I just had a TR 230 cam,Mac headers,ASP pullie,TR ported TB,K&N FIKN,Gran. MAF,and a computer tune.All of this money to get a whopping 330RWHP on a Mustang Dyno at Detroit Speedworks.I dont know if that number was corrected, It was 90+ degrees during testing.The car feels really feels strong, But car searches for an idle a little bit.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well, you have to find out if it was corrected or not.
Example: an air temp of 95F, an absolute pressure of 26 inches mercury, and a vapor pressure of 0.12 will make a correction factor of 1.175. If uncorrected was 330, and the corr factor was 1.175, corrected numbers would be 388rwhp. I just made up 26 in-hg and 0.12 vapor pressure, I have no idea what yours were.
Uncorrected numbers are kind of worthless.
<strong>...and a computer tune.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Who did the tuning, and how did they do it? Did they use a wideband O2 on the dyno? If so, ask to see the air/fuel data.
Of course all the toys doesn't neccessarily mean your fun to play with <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Trending Topics
Tony
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<img border="0" alt="[Camaro]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />
Tom
<strong>Iam going to install my electric cutout on Thursday. Will this affect my a/f ratio alot, I dont want to have to retune my car, its not cheap.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The speedworks dyno will give you a pretty low read (but it will be dead nuts accurate). Most stock LS1 cars put down about 300 on that dyno. You seem a few short, though. Did they program at Speedworks also?
-Geoff
<strong>Mustang brand dynos always give much lower results than a Dynojet brand one. I'd locate a Dynojet and have it redynoed before worring about it.
Tony</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes I too thought it gave lower numbers.
That's why I don't chase or race dyno numbers. Too much variation between dynos, corrections, combos, and how the numbers are quoted. Take care.
mustang 471/542
dynojet 518/592...with no cool off so it could have been higher. I like the Mustang dyno way better...the data collecting capabilities are awesome and the way they load your car is better for setting your a/f...no need to adjust for load on the street like you would with a dynojet
This was on a bone stock 2000 SS A4. It was hotter and higher elevation in Atlanta, btw. The dyno in FL was done when I drove over an hour and pulled right into the bay from the drive there... I was 5 minutes late for my slot, so I had no cool down time.
Both dyno's were dynojets.
Dino





