Cam decision
#2
TECH Addict
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fort Worth,TX
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Cam decision
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by CamSS00:
<strong>I have a 2000 SS camaro. I have flp,borla,lid. I wanting to put a cam in the car. I'm undecided.
Either the B1, Or lunati 224 560 112. The car doesn't get driven much. Which do you guys think would make more power?
Thanks
Jeremie</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I think number 2 will make more power.
<strong>I have a 2000 SS camaro. I have flp,borla,lid. I wanting to put a cam in the car. I'm undecided.
Either the B1, Or lunati 224 560 112. The car doesn't get driven much. Which do you guys think would make more power?
Thanks
Jeremie</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I think number 2 will make more power.
#6
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Re: Cam decision
The install will be the same with the B1 or 224/224. I would expect the 224/224 to make a few more horses up top compared to the B1. The 224/224 is a very streetable cam; I know because I am currently running one from Comp, and it's on a 112 LSA. I have it idling at 825 in gear in my A4 w/ no problems. It would need to be a little higher, though, for when you kick the a/c on.