Every once in a while you get a freak
08-12-2002, 02:29 PM
#21
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak I dont consider my car a freak but with 5000 miles on it and just a lid i ran 12.8? @110.8 that was at 3677lbs.stock paper filter and no free mods.didnt even touch the air in the tires.now i have a translator,Mac headers and orp,and a k&n filter and it made 340 hp and 350 ftlbs.It feels much stronger now so im hoping to run mid 12s @ 114.
as a side note the K&N filter gave me 5 hp on the dyno on back toback runs
as a side note the K&N filter gave me 5 hp on the dyno on back toback runs
08-12-2002, 03:55 PM
#22
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by camaro_ls1:
<strong>Damn, I must've gotten a turd. My first run was 13.67 @102. I've added a few bolt on and I'm only running 13.47 @105. I chalk that up due to poor traction though. Bone stock I dyno'd at 272rwhp and and 275rwtq with my A4 '00 Z28. With a lid and catback I'm right around 320rwhp.
Too bad our cars don't come with dyno graphs on the window stickers. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You're the first person I've heard of that dynoed lower than me stock ... 278rwhp <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
<strong>Damn, I must've gotten a turd. My first run was 13.67 @102. I've added a few bolt on and I'm only running 13.47 @105. I chalk that up due to poor traction though. Bone stock I dyno'd at 272rwhp and and 275rwtq with my A4 '00 Z28. With a lid and catback I'm right around 320rwhp.
Too bad our cars don't come with dyno graphs on the window stickers. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You're the first person I've heard of that dynoed lower than me stock ... 278rwhp <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
08-13-2002, 12:49 AM
#23
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas-freakin'-Texas
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak With @1400 miles on my '01 M6 Z28 and no mods at all (down to the paper air filter, etc...) dyno'd 297/314 fresh off of a 45 minute drive. In other words, about average.
08-13-2002, 04:26 AM
#24
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MysticZ28:
<strong>You're the first person I've heard of that dynoed lower than me stock ... 278rwhp <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Don't feel so bad. My '98 pulled around 280rwhp and about 307rwtq. That's ok...I still ran a 13.46@103.4 at the track. I was happy...and that was before my mods. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong>You're the first person I've heard of that dynoed lower than me stock ... 278rwhp <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Don't feel so bad. My '98 pulled around 280rwhp and about 307rwtq. That's ok...I still ran a 13.46@103.4 at the track. I was happy...and that was before my mods. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
08-13-2002, 06:44 AM
#25
Administrator
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MysticZ28:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by camaro_ls1:
<strong>Damn, I must've gotten a turd. My first run was 13.67 @102. I've added a few bolt on and I'm only running 13.47 @105. I chalk that up due to poor traction though. Bone stock I dyno'd at 272rwhp and and 275rwtq with my A4 '00 Z28. With a lid and catback I'm right around 320rwhp.
Too bad our cars don't come with dyno graphs on the window stickers. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You're the first person I've heard of that dynoed lower than me stock ... 278rwhp <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Oh, don't feel sorry for me. With 5,000 miles on the clock, I dyon'd it for the first time. Run 1 was bone stock down to the paper filter (273 rwhp i think?) I descreened the MAF and dyno'd it again. It pulled 292 which about normal for stock.
**Note: I don't remember the exact numbers, but what I've listed is very close and I know for sure I jumped 19rwhp. I still have the graph somewhere.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by camaro_ls1:
<strong>Damn, I must've gotten a turd. My first run was 13.67 @102. I've added a few bolt on and I'm only running 13.47 @105. I chalk that up due to poor traction though. Bone stock I dyno'd at 272rwhp and and 275rwtq with my A4 '00 Z28. With a lid and catback I'm right around 320rwhp.
Too bad our cars don't come with dyno graphs on the window stickers. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You're the first person I've heard of that dynoed lower than me stock ... 278rwhp <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Oh, don't feel sorry for me. With 5,000 miles on the clock, I dyon'd it for the first time. Run 1 was bone stock down to the paper filter (273 rwhp i think?) I descreened the MAF and dyno'd it again. It pulled 292 which about normal for stock.
**Note: I don't remember the exact numbers, but what I've listed is very close and I know for sure I jumped 19rwhp. I still have the graph somewhere.
08-13-2002, 08:29 AM
#26
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Anti Venom:
<strong>Doesn't the LS6 intake help a little on the years that have it? 01-02 right? Weren't there other little improvements from GM through the years?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah there's the LS6 intake, and improved exhaust manifolds. But there's also a smaller cam, and what seems like less agressive ECM tuning (based on the fact 01-02s seem to see lower timing advace at WOT compare to earlier years).
<strong>Doesn't the LS6 intake help a little on the years that have it? 01-02 right? Weren't there other little improvements from GM through the years?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah there's the LS6 intake, and improved exhaust manifolds. But there's also a smaller cam, and what seems like less agressive ECM tuning (based on the fact 01-02s seem to see lower timing advace at WOT compare to earlier years).
08-13-2002, 10:06 AM
#27
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by NHRATA01:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Anti Venom:
<strong>Doesn't the LS6 intake help a little on the years that have it? 01-02 right? Weren't there other little improvements from GM through the years?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah there's the LS6 intake, and improved exhaust manifolds. But there's also a smaller cam, and what seems like less agressive ECM tuning (based on the fact 01-02s seem to see lower timing advace at WOT compare to earlier years).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That "smaller" cam won't necessarily detract from the power of the newer fbodies. At the very least it provided a boost in midrange torque and I bet picked up a few ponies too.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Anti Venom:
<strong>Doesn't the LS6 intake help a little on the years that have it? 01-02 right? Weren't there other little improvements from GM through the years?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah there's the LS6 intake, and improved exhaust manifolds. But there's also a smaller cam, and what seems like less agressive ECM tuning (based on the fact 01-02s seem to see lower timing advace at WOT compare to earlier years).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That "smaller" cam won't necessarily detract from the power of the newer fbodies. At the very least it provided a boost in midrange torque and I bet picked up a few ponies too.
08-16-2002, 05:15 PM
#29
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sherman Oaks, SFV , CA.
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Every once in a while you get a freak A club member of ours with 02 M6 Z28 put down numbers around 330ish hp with just a lid and a muffler. Although those same numbers with a so called "bone stock 02" is quite impressive!
Imagine what kind of numbers that 02 will put down with some proven hp mods.
I've been told mine was a freak too considering the few mods I had for a 00. With a lid, ported TB, SLP 85mm maf, factory stock SS exhaust non-dual dual and NO cutout it put down 329 rwhp 339 rwtq on a dynojet. I guess I got lucky because my previous 98 Z M6 with 3.73 gears, SLP headers and all bolt-ons and tuned dyno'd it's best at 325 rwhp on the same dyno.
Imagine what kind of numbers that 02 will put down with some proven hp mods.
I've been told mine was a freak too considering the few mods I had for a 00. With a lid, ported TB, SLP 85mm maf, factory stock SS exhaust non-dual dual and NO cutout it put down 329 rwhp 339 rwtq on a dynojet. I guess I got lucky because my previous 98 Z M6 with 3.73 gears, SLP headers and all bolt-ons and tuned dyno'd it's best at 325 rwhp on the same dyno.
