How to "Match" VE's for a new Cam
Dot to Dot: IVO:2 degrees BTDC and EVC:2 degrees ADTC means that overlap is centered over TDC. Total overlap is 4 degrees.
1 degree retard- IVO: 1 degree BTDC EVC:3 degrees ATDC means that overlap is more biased to the exhaust. Still 4 degrees overlap.
1 degree advance- IVO: 3 degree BTDC EVC:1 degrees ATDC means that overlap is more biased to the intake. Still 4 degrees overlap.
You can use the DCR calculator and play with your degree numbers(ICl) to see what ICL will make you overlap as close to centered over TDC.
So then what is the difference between grinding the advance/retard into the cam and doing it by not installing dot to dot?
Also do you maybe know were I could find an article that will explain how all the VE effect everything, and I noticed that some of the big guys on here talk about"matching there VE's", but what do you match them to? Maybe the other mods they have, like a free-flowing exhaust you would want more exhaust duration or lift? Or if you have a set of ported heads with a great high CFM flowing intake you want more itake duration/lift. And what would it be better to add duration or lift since they both pretty much effect how long the valve is open what would be the difference in 232 duration .600 lift -and- 228 duration .630 lift (or whatever would allow the valve to stay open just as long as the first scenario)
VE = Volumetric Efficiency
What this refers to tables in the PCM describing what the flow through the motor is predicted to be from intake to exhaust for any given RPM and throttle position.
To answer one of the questions, to the best of my knowledge there is no difference between advancing the cam with an adjustable timing chain and having the advance ground in. Some people actually end up changing the advance/retard with the adjustable timing chain if the cam is ground with too much/too little advance. It's possible to order a cam with a +2 but end up getting a +3.5. In that case you can compinsate for this with the adjustable timing chain.
I'd bet most of the time when you see people saying "matching VE's" they're talking about to their application. Example...There isn't much point in buying a cam with 645 lift on the intake if your cylinder heads run out of breathe at around 600 lift. It would probaby work fine, but it's not an optimized setup. To fully take advantage of the high lift LSK lobes, you should *in my opinion* have high flowing cylinder heads.
Last edited by Xtnct00WS6; Mar 8, 2007 at 11:35 PM.
Im not looking for advice on a cam either I'm just trying to learn how the valve events effect effect the way the car will perform...For example, I saw Patrick G looking over a cam the other day and he said the overlap was exhaust biased, which I cant remeber what that caused in terms of the way the power was distributed but this is the type of thing I am tying to figure out...how all the different valve events effect everything.
To answer one of the questions, to the best of my knowledge there is no difference between advancing the cam with an adjustable timing chain and having the advance ground in. Some people actually end up changing the advance/retard with the adjustable timing chain if the cam is ground with too much/too little advance. You can order a cam with a +2 but end up getting a +3.5 so you can compinsate for this with the adjustable timing chain.
236-230= 6
6/4=1.5 (result / 4 = number of degrees biased)
So this would be 1.5 degrees intake biased since it's the smaller of the two numbers. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. It's pretty close to my equation above. I'm not sure what happens when you advance or retard the cam though. Maybe someone will chime in with that answer.
So for a 230/236 .598/.598 112 +2
IVO - 7 BTDC
IVC - 43 ABDC
EVO - 50 BBDC
EVC 2 ATDC
9 Degrees overlap
So if I am rigth this cam would have a 5 degree intake bias (im guessing intake since the most overlap is BTDC)
But what about the world of other VE, how do THEY effect how the car drives.
Trending Topics
So for a 230/236 .598/.598 112 +2
IVO - 7 BTDC
IVC - 43 ABDC
EVO - 50 BBDC
EVC 2 ATDC
9 Degrees overlap
So if I am rigth this cam would have a 5 degree intake bias (im guessing intake since the most overlap is BTDC)
But what about the world of other VE, how do THEY effect how the car drives.
IVO: 5 BTDC
IVC: 45 ABDC
EVO: 52 BBDC
EVC: 4 ATDC
This cam has its overlap biased 1/2 degree to the exhaust side of TDC.
Here's a better illustration. Same cam, but different advances:
230/236 112LSA +4
IVO: 7 BTDC
IVC: 43 ABDC
EVO: 54 BBDC
EVC: 2 ATDC
This cam has its overlap biased 2.5 degrees to the exhaust side of TDC. This means it will be strong down low, but run out of breath faster after its power peak.
230/236 112LSA +0
IVO: 3 BTDC
IVC: 47 ABDC
EVO: 50 BBDC
EVC: 6 ATDC
This cam has its overlap biased 1.5 degrees to the intake side of TDC. This means it will pull harder and longer after its power peak.

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
And what about this question from the original post:
And what would it be better to add duration or lift since they both pretty much effect how long the valve is open what would be the difference in 232 duration .600 lift -and- 228 duration .630 lift (or whatever would allow the valve to stay open just as long as the first scenario)
also which calculator are you using to get VE's? The one I have must be wrong.
thank you for posting!
236-230= 6
6/4=1.5 (result / 4 = number of degrees biased)
So this would be 1.5 degrees intake biased since it's the smaller of the two numbers. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. It's pretty close to my equation above. I'm not sure what happens when you advance or retard the cam though. Maybe someone will chime in with that answer.
also which calculator are you using to get VE's? The one I have must be wrong.
Another way to compare cams is duration at .200 lift. .006 and .050 are industry yardsticks that allow general comparison of the profiles, but .200 lift figures can vary greatly between cams that on the surface appear similar. Two cams that have similar seat and .050 durations and similar LSA and ICL should also operate in much the same way. More agressive lobes have more duration at .200 and offer the potential to flow more air. Generally to keep valve acceleration under control, higher lift is also necessary.
The DCR calculator in my signature will also give VE's. Also, read up on the cam guide link there.

Try this: http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...ID=-2026144213
Last edited by Xtnct00WS6; Mar 11, 2007 at 01:00 PM.
http://www.compcams.com/Community/Articles
/Details.asp?ID=-2026144213
Cam Design Theory from David Vizard
After reading it, I more or less applied its theory to a cam I had been looking into, and seemed to fit rather well. See that thread to see what tech's better contributors had to say.



