Any benefit to a 113 LSA over instead of 114 LSA for a medium sized cam a B1, T1, C1, C2, TR 220 or TR224 sized cams?

I know 114 is emissions friendly and idles well but pushs the powerband up

I know 112 is less emissions friendly and idles rougher but keeps the powerband down.

I was thinking the 113 LSA might be a good compromise.

Any one know? Any idea?

 

hmm i dont know that much about cams so i would liekto hear this too, i was thinking about a cam with a 114lsa but i want a rough idle so then i go to the 112lsa but then it throws codes and its nothin that i know of that will keep thoes codes from comming up during inspection time, power band dosent matter to me casue i just look for the widest one that starts no higher than 2000rpm

 

I suppose you followed the 112/114 discussion on this board and the other ? It seems the difference between 112/114 is not much when the cam specs are otherwise the same. 113/114 would be neglible powerband wise and I believe playing with cam advance/retard gives you more in placing the powerband.