Those with G5 cam...
09-28-2002, 03:04 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DFW area, tx
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those with G5 cam... A week from monday my car goes in for the G5 and vig2800. LG has been really helpful and told me pretty much what to expect, but I was just wondering what those with it already, think. by the way, it's a daily driver. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
09-28-2002, 03:24 PM
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Those with G5 cam... I had it for a month or so. Car made good power but mine was a dd also and because of the reverse split pattern it was a little to lumpy and shaky for MY taste. I now have the single pattern TR 224/224 and it is 10x's better in traffic as far as shaking goes. Just thought I'd help.
09-28-2002, 05:46 PM
#4
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Those with G5 cam... </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Bear:
<strong>Car made good power but mine was a dd also and because of the reverse split pattern it was a little to lumpy and shaky for MY taste. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Bear, the G5 is a traditional split pattern cam, with more bias towards the exhaust side (224/230 cam). It is not a reverse split. (i.e. 230/224)
DrowningMan, your car is going to run great with the G5 cam. Take a look in the 1/4mi section. Someone just went 11.0x with one and a Yank 4400 converter. Only thing I would look into changing is maybe going up to a 3600 Vig with that cam instead of the 2800.
Jason
<small>[ September 28, 2002, 05:49 PM: Message edited by: Jason99T/A ]</small>
<strong>Car made good power but mine was a dd also and because of the reverse split pattern it was a little to lumpy and shaky for MY taste. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Bear, the G5 is a traditional split pattern cam, with more bias towards the exhaust side (224/230 cam). It is not a reverse split. (i.e. 230/224)
DrowningMan, your car is going to run great with the G5 cam. Take a look in the 1/4mi section. Someone just went 11.0x with one and a Yank 4400 converter. Only thing I would look into changing is maybe going up to a 3600 Vig with that cam instead of the 2800.
Jason
<small>[ September 28, 2002, 05:49 PM: Message edited by: Jason99T/A ]</small>
09-28-2002, 10:03 PM
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DFW area, tx
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Those with G5 cam... Well theres a story too the 2800, LG more or less picked it for me. I wasn't really ready to do a stall yet, but even with tuning they said it would be really hard to get the G5 to idle right with out it. They worked with me on it, and I suppose they picked a less aggresive stall cause I wasn't planning on it in the first place. Thanks for the inpu, I kinda have a feel of what to expect now.
09-29-2002, 02:49 PM
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Those with G5 cam... The LSA on the TR224 is 112 for me. I used the same programming from Ed W. and tunes it further on the wideband dyno. I could have sworn thta it was a reverse split, but maube I am just Loco myself. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Trending Topics
09-30-2002, 12:43 AM
#8
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Those with G5 cam... </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Bear:
<strong>I had it for a month or so. Car made good power but mine was a dd also and because of the reverse split pattern it was a little to lumpy and shaky for MY taste. I now have the single pattern TR 224/224 and it is 10x's better in traffic as far as shaking goes. Just thought I'd help.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What LSA on the TR cam? Did you reprogram?
<strong>I had it for a month or so. Car made good power but mine was a dd also and because of the reverse split pattern it was a little to lumpy and shaky for MY taste. I now have the single pattern TR 224/224 and it is 10x's better in traffic as far as shaking goes. Just thought I'd help.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What LSA on the TR cam? Did you reprogram?
