How big is too big with reverse split cams???
stock rods, arp rod bolts etc. etc. My question is this---How big of a reverse split cam can I go with and what effect would a lower LSA have with the reverse split--say 108 or so. I also would like to keep the lift around .600" as my heads flow well up to that point--307cfm intake and 219 exhaust at .600" lift. I would think that I could go larger on duration and lift as compared to say a TR230/224 b/c of the valve reliefs in the Wisecos. Just looking to get around 7000rpms out of the motor with decent low end power. Thanks <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
PS - the ring and pinion are going back in this week and then we will start guttin her out. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
On the same note but for a tamer set up, what do you think of the following all on XE-R lobes and 114 LSA with about .566 lift.
224/220
225/220
225/222
I want to get a TR-220 or B1 quality idle with a TR-224's top end charge.
Trending Topics
if it were me and i was willing to spin to 7K rpms i would go with a 232/226 .600/.580 (since the heads flow insane) on a 112 LSA.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
should be pretty rowdy, even on my 382 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> .
is there a rule of thumb on how much more duration you need for added cubes???
I would go no bigger than a 230/___ cam or whatever sponsors like Thunder Racing reccomends, they have done a lot of testing and no doubt have an opinion on what is too big for a stock shortblock car.
Too much duration and you will need to flycut the pistons.
<small>[ October 02, 2002, 04:25 PM: Message edited by: VINCE ]</small>
<strong>I thought Vince lost peak rwhp with the new cam.
I would go no bigger than a 230/___ cam or whatever sponsors like Thunder Racing reccomends, they have done a lot of testing and no doubt have an opinion on what is too big for a stock shortblock car.
Too much duration and you will need to flycut the pistons.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">PSJ, larger than 230 cams will gain power, but they are close to the upper bounds. The specs Vince posted are a little wild on the idle side but will make killer power. I had a 231/225 110 LSA in my car back in my 346 cu in days and it pulled all the way to 7 grand, made over 440 rwhp and 420 rwtq.
<strong>travis, the 230 intake number has made some huge power. take a look at the peak HP of the bigger boys like the 232 T2 cam. it did not make much peak over the 230 cams on 346". </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Gator, you can't just sit here and compare .050" duration numbers and think you have a fair assessment. The 232 Fireball is running has 2 degrees more advertised duration than a Thunder 232 lobe and 4 degrees more duration than Vince's 232 Xe-R lobe.
To answer the question, I wouldn't go tighter than a 110-109 LSA if you don't care about idle quality but still want it to run right, and I wouldnt go more than 6 degrees split. I think you should try the 232/226 110 LSA XE-R cam Vince suggested, it will fly with those GTP heads!






