2.055 intake and 1.55 exhaust valves, too big for stock cubes?
10-16-2002, 11:27 PM
#2
Re: 2.055 intake and 1.55 exhaust valves, too big for stock cubes? I dont liek em. One set of heads with 227 cc runner and those valves gets beaten up to .500 lift by a good amount by heads that cc 231 on th intake with 2.02s. Thats the jist of wwhat ive seen without getting into details about who did what <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
10-17-2002, 12:22 AM
#3
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2.055 intake and 1.55 exhaust valves, too big for stock cubes? Call Craig at GTP, he swears by the 2.02 1.57 combo for stock cubes the way he does his ports, and no other sponsors on this board surpass his work.
10-17-2002, 08:27 AM
#5
Re: 2.055 intake and 1.55 exhaust valves, too big for stock cubes? </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong>Call Craig at GTP, he swears by the 2.02 1.57 combo for stock cubes the way he does his ports, and no other sponsors on this board surpass his work.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Be careful throwing around such strong assumptions. There is at least one other sponsor on this board that has come a long way in porting techniques and styles that is very competitive with GTP in terms of flow numbers and power.
<small>[ October 17, 2002, 08:59 AM: Message edited by: The Alchemist ]</small>
<strong>Call Craig at GTP, he swears by the 2.02 1.57 combo for stock cubes the way he does his ports, and no other sponsors on this board surpass his work.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Be careful throwing around such strong assumptions. There is at least one other sponsor on this board that has come a long way in porting techniques and styles that is very competitive with GTP in terms of flow numbers and power.
<small>[ October 17, 2002, 08:59 AM: Message edited by: The Alchemist ]</small>
10-17-2002, 09:17 AM
#6
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2.055 intake and 1.55 exhaust valves, too big for stock cubes? </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by The Alchemist:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong>Call Craig at GTP, he swears by the 2.02 1.57 combo for stock cubes the way he does his ports, and no other sponsors on this board surpass his work.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Be careful throwing around such strong assumptions. There is at least one other sponsor on this board that has come a long way in porting techniques and styles that is very competitive with GTP in terms of flow numbers and power.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Check my wording. I never said 'no one else was comparable', or 'GTP has no equals', I just said no one outdoes Craig from what I have seen.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong>Call Craig at GTP, he swears by the 2.02 1.57 combo for stock cubes the way he does his ports, and no other sponsors on this board surpass his work.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Be careful throwing around such strong assumptions. There is at least one other sponsor on this board that has come a long way in porting techniques and styles that is very competitive with GTP in terms of flow numbers and power.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Check my wording. I never said 'no one else was comparable', or 'GTP has no equals', I just said no one outdoes Craig from what I have seen.
10-17-2002, 09:46 AM
#7
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2.055 intake and 1.55 exhaust valves, too big for stock cubes? FWIW, my motor seems to make decent hp with the little 2.02"/1.57" valves in my heads. That's with a larger than stock 4.100" bore, as well.
