Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3L vs. LS6 Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2002, 09:09 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Brandon98TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grapevine, TX / College Station, TX
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3L vs. LS6 Heads

I was wondering what the advantage to each is. For stock displacement and stage 2 porting, are more people going with the 5.3s b/c they are cheaper or are they actually flowing better then a set of LS6s? I was under the impression that the LS6 flowed the best, but now I am seeing a lot more people choosing 5.3s. What is so good about them? Also, in a larger bore situation, all bore 383, are the 5.3s still the best option? Thanks for all the info.
Brandon
Old 11-06-2002, 01:24 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 5.3L vs. LS6 Heads

I'm no expert here, so I can't answer your 383 question...however as for the 5.3 vs LS6 heads - the reason most are going with the 5.3 heads are because they give you a compression bump without milling the heads. If you mill the heads you can go up to about 11.5:1 I believe and still have clearance for most cams.

I will be going with 5.3 heads becuase they give the bump in compression ratio and the cylinder head is actually CNC. Oh yeah, and they save a ton of money.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.