tr224 or tr 230/224 which would be better for auto w?4000 conv.
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: A DEAD END
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tr224 or tr 230/224 which would be better for auto w?4000 conv.
i cant decide,wich would be better.the dynos look real close to 5500 then the 230/224 pulls slightly ahead.with the m6 i would for sure go 230/224 but with auto im re-thinking this,maybe i should go 224/224.any suggestions,gearing is 3.42s,im prolly gonna stay with 3.42s due to N2O.
#2
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: From the Bowels of Hell!!! You want some of me bitch?!?!?!
Posts: 3,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: tr224 or tr 230/224 which would be better for auto w?4000 conv.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by CONFUZED:
<strong>i cant decide,wich would be better.the dynos look real close to 5500 then the 230/224 pulls slightly ahead.with the m6 i would for sure go 230/224 but with auto im re-thinking this,maybe i should go 224/224.any suggestions,gearing is 3.42s,im prolly gonna stay with 3.42s due to N2O.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">IMO, I would do a 230/230. Your convertor will keep it in the power range.You keeping the stock heads or changin' them too? I would also change the gears to 3.73's. But run the 3.42's first, just to see how they do. You'll be OK on the N2O with the 3.73's. What first gear did you get in the TH400?
Hurry up and get that load on the road so I can began smackin' you around.
Tim
<strong>i cant decide,wich would be better.the dynos look real close to 5500 then the 230/224 pulls slightly ahead.with the m6 i would for sure go 230/224 but with auto im re-thinking this,maybe i should go 224/224.any suggestions,gearing is 3.42s,im prolly gonna stay with 3.42s due to N2O.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">IMO, I would do a 230/230. Your convertor will keep it in the power range.You keeping the stock heads or changin' them too? I would also change the gears to 3.73's. But run the 3.42's first, just to see how they do. You'll be OK on the N2O with the 3.73's. What first gear did you get in the TH400?
Hurry up and get that load on the road so I can began smackin' you around.
Tim
#3
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Re: tr224 or tr 230/224 which would be better for auto w?4000 conv.
I would put the 224 cam in for spraying and still be bad *** on moter. I talked to Justin SEars and he said he was probably quiker with the 224 cam because the power was down a good bit below 6000 rps and only picked up like 5 hp above that. Either way you will still break Parts <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />