Looking for a good emmisions friendly cam
Thx
And I thought I was the only insomniac on the board right now <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
I see that you live in CA. Being that i live in CA and dealt with the Cam Emissions in my SS i had, i would first tell you to stick with the 114 lsa as opposed to the 112.
with that being said and done, I had the TR-224 Cam with FLP longtubes (hi flow cats) and the car passed the California 15mph and 25mph tests flawlessly (sp?)!!!!
On the 15mph test i was allowed i believe 40 hydrocarbons and i showed up like 12-13.
On the 25 mph test i was allowed i believe 35 or so, and the car showed 11 i believe.
TR-224 baby!
If I had to guess as to whether not not a TR-220 112lsa could pass, i think it could be done, but dont quote me on it.
<strong>Thunder Racing 220* on a 114* does not set missfire codes so it should pass no problem.Slowhawk made decent power with it also.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I also have my TR 220 for sale <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Went non-emmision legal <img border="0" title="" alt="[Embarrassed]" src="gr_emb.gif" />

