How small of a cam is to small
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> It is the TPIS ZL10, these are the specs:
Intake:208, Exhaust:216 at .050, and the lift is .525.
What is anyone's thoughts on this cam?
Specs can be found at www.tpis.com, click on LS1, then Valve Train. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">personally i think this is a waste of time, but what does everyone else think? He wants a good cam that wont effect driveablity any. I reccomended a TR224 or the comp 224 .563 to him. Since he has a M6 is idle really wont be effected to bad.
but if he does put that cam above in will he still need beefier valve springs and pushrods??
what would everyone else do? Ditch it and get something bigger?
Trending Topics
Definately not a waste.. a very nice street cam without any issues..the low duration makes it perfect for the street (power is low and midrange)and most importantly FOR ME <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If they are too small it might not be a good bang for the buck for most folks, unless you are some HVAC guy who does his own camwork (thooperman).
He could go with a comp XE 220/220 115 +2 advance and it would be almost undetectable at idle and provide much better power than the TPIS cam. A 216/220 114 would be a good choice if he doesn't have headers.
<strong>.
If they are too small it might not be a good bang for the buck for most folks, unless you are some HVAC guy who does his own camwork (thooperman).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Good point Johhny Rockets, i guess if you`re gonna pay to have it installed go with something bigger... I can change one quick if I get bored.. which I may be already <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />







