Trex on Stock Heads?
There was a post on here, by Jason at TSP, that talked about some actual PTV specs they got with the MS4, might want to read that keeping in mind that all engines are different.
come on now
PTVC should be measured and cam degreed.
I do not subscribe to the "many have done it without an issue" and what if you are one of the few? Collateral damage

Patrick says it straight, those combos are legit if optimized. I've beaten T-Rex at the track with a H/C 224, why? Because his setup wasn't optimised.
Morale is don't just think that by shoving the biggest cam you're gonna move faster.
Power numbers are for dyno queens, track numbers are for road killers.
Combo-Combo-Combo, cha-cha-cha
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Strange because I had a Trex in my car and there wasn't any issues. I have another local friend who has a Trex as well; same thing. Both cars 100% stock heads, no porting milling nothing, 100% stock/gaskets and all.
I am just happy that places like Thunder Racing and Texas Speed exist! Most speed shops are dumb, but these guys are hands on and want to help you.
The only issue I can see with the MS4 is maybe springs, but I have never run their springs, but I am about to. The MS4 has a much more aggressive lift, which could lead to impending spring failure. They seem to have one of the best springs out there, so the choice is up to you. The MS4 makes great power, and so does the TRex. If I had to choose one, it would be the TRex, and I did. Now, also take this into account. I don't know who has had any issues with this cam, at all. I don't run it, nor do I intend to. I am just speaking from a technical point of view, in that the cam is larger, so you can do the math. I do know that the power it makes is scary, and is definitely a prospect for top dog status.
I am just happy that places like Thunder Racing and Texas Speed exist! Most speed shops are dumb, but these guys are hands on and want to help you.
The only issue I can see with the MS4 is maybe springs, but I have never run their springs, but I am about to. The MS4 has a much more aggressive lift, which could lead to impending spring failure. They seem to have one of the best springs out there, so the choice is up to you. The MS4 makes great power, and so does the TRex. If I had to choose one, it would be the TRex, and I did. Now, also take this into account. I don't know who has had any issues with this cam, at all. I don't run it, nor do I intend to. I am just speaking from a technical point of view, in that the cam is larger, so you can do the math. I do know that the power it makes is scary, and is definitely a prospect for top dog status.
this guy here knows wats up and wat he is talkin about.
this guy here knows wats up and wat he is talkin about.

BTW, here is my piston after running a TRex to 7,000rpm. No damage to any piston other than the ones with the spun bearings. (Creates slack so that the rod allows the piston to reach higher than originaly intended. In this case it actually hit my cylidner head, as you can see by the obvious outline of the combustion chamber.)

I would love to see Texas Speed, Thunder Racing, and Vengeance Performance each build a car to break the cam only record. I feel it would be pretty interesting. It would also push each manufacturer to assess their cams, and possibly alter them if they needed. It would be even more interesting if they could get one to go in the 10-teens with their cams off the shelf, only using parts they sell on their sites.
PTVC should be measured and cam degreed.
I do not subscribe to the "many have done it without an issue" and what if you are one of the few? Collateral damage

Patrick says it straight, those combos are legit if optimized. I've beaten T-Rex at the track with a H/C 224, why? Because his setup wasn't optimised.
Morale is don't just think that by shoving the biggest cam you're gonna move faster.
Power numbers are for dyno queens, track numbers are for road killers.
Combo-Combo-Combo, cha-cha-cha








