Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PRC stage 1.5 or 2.5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2007, 05:44 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
Marc '99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Albany, GA
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Unhappy PRC stage 1.5 or 2.5?

I ordered the 2.5's Friday but now i'm wondering if I should've got the 1.5's instead. It is for a 224/228 on LSK lobes and a FAST 90. I'm going to be running a .040 Cometic for a DCR of 8.76 and SCR of 11.33.
Old 06-02-2007, 07:52 PM
  #2  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

neither 224 nor 228 are lsk lobes, 223-227 are both lsk lobes
Old 06-02-2007, 07:53 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
Marc '99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Albany, GA
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They are both available with either 2.02" or 2.04" intake valves, but the 1.5's have 1.55" exhaust valves and the 2.5's have 1.75". I went with the 2.02" intake. Is 1.75" too big for the exhaust?
Old 06-02-2007, 10:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

1.578 exhaust valve
Old 06-03-2007, 12:31 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
NHRAFORMULA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Manteno,illinois
Posts: 1,629
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

the 2.5 heads come with stainless valves intake and exhaust, the 1.5 heads have stainless intake valves only and STOCK 1.55 exhaust valves,IMO get the 2.5 heads,i would not want stock size valves in a ported head.

Last edited by NHRAFORMULA00; 06-03-2007 at 12:42 AM.
Old 06-03-2007, 06:34 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
MARKSZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: bama bitch
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2.5 are hard to beat
Old 06-03-2007, 09:04 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

FWI those heads still have stock seats.
Stock seats are 2.02 so putting a bigger valve on them (2.04) will not yield the full potential a 2.04 should deliver. Also the 2.04 valve on a 2.02 seat is never fully properly seated. Any honest head porter will vouch for that.
IMO more than a 2.02 valve on those is a waste.

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 06-03-2007 at 09:12 AM.
Old 06-03-2007, 10:59 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
00T\A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NW Houston,TX
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think you made a good choice.
Old 06-03-2007, 04:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
TVWilkes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: RainbowCity,Alabama
Posts: 1,292
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
FWI those heads still have stock seats.
Stock seats are 2.02 so putting a bigger valve on them (2.04) will not yield the full potential a 2.04 should deliver. Also the 2.04 valve on a 2.02 seat is never fully properly seated. Any honest head porter will vouch for that.
IMO more than a 2.02 valve on those is a waste.
The valve job that TSP cuts for a 2.04 vavle is opened up for a 2.04 valve. They don't jam a 2.04 valve in place of a 2.02,that would be stupid. So yes,you do get the potential of the 2.04 valve. The 2.04 valve will work properly in the factory valve seat. This has been performed thousands of times will zero problems. Just because you can fit a 2.04 valve in the stock seat doesn't make you dishonest. TSP's work is quality and spot on. BTW,they don't offer the 2.04 valve anymore.
Old 06-03-2007, 04:40 PM
  #10  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The 2.5 cylinder head is definately the best way to go. The bigger exhaust valve is well worth the extra little bit of money.

The 2.04 valve has been used by just about every LS cylinder head company around. With our cnc valve job machine we can create valve job configurations that most machine shops could only dream of attempting.
That being said, the 2.04 valve option is no longer available @ TSP. Our port design & 2.02 valve configuration just work better together.
Just because a 2.04 valve is bigger doesn't mean it will work better in every application. There's tons of aspects of a valve that determine how it works & flows. The PRC 2.5 cylinder head was designed with a 2.02 valve, as a results that configuration works best for us. I personally prefer the 2.02 valve in both of our cylinder head configurations because it moves better low lift flow, better p/v clearance, and works best with our chamber designs....
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 06-03-2007, 07:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
That being said, the 2.04 valve option is no longer available @ TSP.
You still equip the heads with the 2.04 valve according to your website. If what you say is true, you may want to change your site. Additionally, I just bought a set of your 2.5 5.3L heads very recently... do I have 2.02 valves? I was told 2.04 over the phone!
Old 06-04-2007, 12:55 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
Marc '99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Albany, GA
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the input guys.
Old 06-04-2007, 03:18 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TVWilkes
The valve job that TSP cuts for a 2.04 vavle is opened up for a 2.04 valve. They don't jam a 2.04 valve in place of a 2.02,that would be stupid. So yes,you do get the potential of the 2.04 valve. The 2.04 valve will work properly in the factory valve seat. This has been performed thousands of times will zero problems. Just because you can fit a 2.04 valve in the stock seat doesn't make you dishonest. TSP's work is quality and spot on. BTW,they don't offer the 2.04 valve anymore.
Please do no put words in my mouth. I NEVER said TSP is dishonest.
I said that "any honest head porter will tell you that 2.04 on stock 2.02 valve seat will not yield the full potential of what the 2.04 can achieve".
Please let us get that straight.
An aftermarket seat that can properly seat a 2.04 valve will yield better flow results.
That is plain and simple.

Just because it was or is common practice, it doesn't mean it is the BEST option.

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
The 2.5 cylinder head is definately the best way to go. The bigger exhaust valve is well worth the extra little bit of money.

The 2.04 valve has been used by just about every LS cylinder head company around. With our cnc valve job machine we can create valve job configurations that most machine shops could only dream of attempting.
That being said, the 2.04 valve option is no longer available @ TSP. Our port design & 2.02 valve configuration just work better together.
Just because a 2.04 valve is bigger doesn't mean it will work better in every application. There's tons of aspects of a valve that determine how it works & flows. The PRC 2.5 cylinder head was designed with a 2.02 valve, as a results that configuration works best for us. I personally prefer the 2.02 valve in both of our cylinder head configurations because it moves better low lift flow, better p/v clearance, and works best with our chamber designs....
There is the proof of what I said.

TSP is a good sponsor and has been known to make quality products. What I like about them is they R&D their products and if some need upgrade, they are not afraid of divulging their findings.
When we work in the HI-PO area, we learn from our live results and TSP is always on top of their game to seek unchartered territories for more power.

BTW I used run a 5.3L with 2.04 valves and TSP ground cam, so I know first hand about the items I used.
Old 06-06-2007, 05:59 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
9ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sorry to bring up an old thread, and somewhat off topic, sorta ... but better than crowding up the forums with a new thread.

Will the PRC Stage 2.5 heads work with an LS2 with G5X3 cam (as far as PTV clearance goes) with the 2.02 valves? Doesn't say that the heads are milled on their site and I know of many other vendors who have heads with this sized valve and people running them with cams just as large if not larger on LS2. Just being safe before I drop the loot on these heads.

THANKS!
Old 06-07-2007, 07:19 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

No, not enough PTV clearance. You'll need LS2/LS6 stage 1 (stock valved) CNC ported with dual springs.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.