PRC stage 1.5 or 2.5?
Last edited by NHRAFORMULA00; Jun 3, 2007 at 12:42 AM.
Stock seats are 2.02 so putting a bigger valve on them (2.04) will not yield the full potential a 2.04 should deliver. Also the 2.04 valve on a 2.02 seat is never fully properly seated. Any honest head porter will vouch for that.
IMO more than a 2.02 valve on those is a waste.
Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; Jun 3, 2007 at 09:12 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Stock seats are 2.02 so putting a bigger valve on them (2.04) will not yield the full potential a 2.04 should deliver. Also the 2.04 valve on a 2.02 seat is never fully properly seated. Any honest head porter will vouch for that.
IMO more than a 2.02 valve on those is a waste.
The 2.04 valve has been used by just about every LS cylinder head company around. With our cnc valve job machine we can create valve job configurations that most machine shops could only dream of attempting.
That being said, the 2.04 valve option is no longer available @ TSP. Our port design & 2.02 valve configuration just work better together.
Just because a 2.04 valve is bigger doesn't mean it will work better in every application. There's tons of aspects of a valve that determine how it works & flows. The PRC 2.5 cylinder head was designed with a 2.02 valve, as a results that configuration works best for us. I personally prefer the 2.02 valve in both of our cylinder head configurations because it moves better low lift flow, better p/v clearance, and works best with our chamber designs....
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
I said that "any honest head porter will tell you that 2.04 on stock 2.02 valve seat will not yield the full potential of what the 2.04 can achieve".
Please let us get that straight.
An aftermarket seat that can properly seat a 2.04 valve will yield better flow results.
That is plain and simple.
Just because it was or is common practice, it doesn't mean it is the BEST option.
The 2.04 valve has been used by just about every LS cylinder head company around. With our cnc valve job machine we can create valve job configurations that most machine shops could only dream of attempting.
That being said, the 2.04 valve option is no longer available @ TSP. Our port design & 2.02 valve configuration just work better together.
Just because a 2.04 valve is bigger doesn't mean it will work better in every application. There's tons of aspects of a valve that determine how it works & flows. The PRC 2.5 cylinder head was designed with a 2.02 valve, as a results that configuration works best for us. I personally prefer the 2.02 valve in both of our cylinder head configurations because it moves better low lift flow, better p/v clearance, and works best with our chamber designs....
TSP is a good sponsor and has been known to make quality products. What I like about them is they R&D their products and if some need upgrade, they are not afraid of divulging their findings.
When we work in the HI-PO area, we learn from our live results and TSP is always on top of their game to seek unchartered territories for more power.
BTW I used run a 5.3L with 2.04 valves and TSP ground cam, so I know first hand about the items I used.
Will the PRC Stage 2.5 heads work with an LS2 with G5X3 cam (as far as PTV clearance goes) with the 2.02 valves? Doesn't say that the heads are milled on their site and I know of many other vendors who have heads with this sized valve and people running them with cams just as large if not larger on LS2. Just being safe before I drop the loot on these heads.
THANKS!


