TSP 224r vs. Torquer V2 in a 6.0 LQ9
06-10-2007, 08:24 AM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TSP 224r vs. Torquer V2 in a 6.0 LQ9 I need a litte guidance in regards to selecting a cam. I have a Regular Cab Short Bed Silverado weighing in at 4300 lbs. I have a TT2600, Long Tube Headers, CAI, and 4.10 gears. I am buying a LQ9 to put in it.
The engine is going to remain stock except for the cam/valvetrain. Looking a TSP's site, the 224r and the Torquer V2 have nearly the same powerband. I was going to go 224r. But now, I am thinking the V2. Is the V2 too much cam for the existing mods and vehicle weight? I do not want to spin the motor much more than 6200, max 6500 rpm.
Should I be concerned about PTV clearances with the v2?
The engine is going to remain stock except for the cam/valvetrain. Looking a TSP's site, the 224r and the Torquer V2 have nearly the same powerband. I was going to go 224r. But now, I am thinking the V2. Is the V2 too much cam for the existing mods and vehicle weight? I do not want to spin the motor much more than 6200, max 6500 rpm.
Should I be concerned about PTV clearances with the v2?
06-11-2007, 09:32 AM
#2
I'd definatley look to something a little bit smaller than the torquer in a truck. Honestly I'd look to the 224/228 or the 228/228 camshaft. Both of those would get you a little bit more hp than the 224 camshaft.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
