How much different are these two cams?
Originally Posted by SDMForever
LSA deals with how sharp the inclines on the lobes are. The Lower the LSA the meaner it will sound, and I beleive you will se mainly torque gains from the lower LSA.
How close the .006, .050, and .200 durations are to one another gives you a general idea of how agressive the lobe is.
But yes, the tighter LSA might show a little more down low.
im sure he had something else goin on.... 119 lsa is a stock lsa and unherd of (at least to me) in afterstock cams... idk why urs is that low, and, idk why that other one is so high, it seems weerd to me.
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, NY
I may have read my cam card wrong, its' 118.4 lsa if it matters
But still the big diff in numbers? The specs of both cars were quite similar except for the gears.
The 1st cam I listed, is in the CAM Only thread, theres a dyno graph that looks real good to me, lots of torque under the curve!
see https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/219024-cam-only-dyno-thread.html
#16
But still the big diff in numbers? The specs of both cars were quite similar except for the gears.
The 1st cam I listed, is in the CAM Only thread, theres a dyno graph that looks real good to me, lots of torque under the curve!
see https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/219024-cam-only-dyno-thread.html
#16
Last edited by cam1999; Sep 6, 2007 at 06:41 PM.
