Preliminary results LG Motorsports 346ci solid roller.
We completed our first test on a solid roller 346 cu in LS1, and here are the results.
We had a balance problem. The engine is apart and getting some new design pistons,and some
other head work. We are going to try some other cams while we are at it. this is just a test
bed
This engine was built to run 8000 rpms. The LS6 manifold runs out of air at 6700.
This is why the hp flattens out above that. The cam should have a power peak at 7500.
We are shooting for a power peak of 7500 to 7600 rpms, and a peak rwhp of 500.
We are waiting for a new manifold to do this.
The thing to notice is that if this car was shifted at 7400 rpm it whould never fall
below 450 rwhp.
Stay tuned.
Thanks
Lou Gigliotti LG Motorsports

We had a balance problem. The engine is apart and getting some new design pistons,and some
other head work. We are going to try some other cams while we are at it. this is just a test
bed
This engine was built to run 8000 rpms. The LS6 manifold runs out of air at 6700.
This is why the hp flattens out above that. The cam should have a power peak at 7500.
We are shooting for a power peak of 7500 to 7600 rpms, and a peak rwhp of 500.
We are waiting for a new manifold to do this.
The thing to notice is that if this car was shifted at 7400 rpm it whould never fall
below 450 rwhp.
Stay tuned.
Thanks
Lou Gigliotti LG Motorsports

JMG5X-2, I mean JMX
I agree Can't wait till we get a better manifold. Just think about this: At 8000 rpms the pistons go up and down 133 times per second. So the manifold is trying to move air at that rate also. And the intake valves open and close 67 times per second. That is 67 pulses of air per second also.
But I love RPMs. We shifted our Trans AM C5 Race car at 9000 for qualifying!
This engine has a stock crank, forged rods and pistons.
Later,
Lou G
PS, Jack (burnout) where have you been lately?
Trending Topics
Very impressive Lou! this may be the Open Road Race motor I have been looking for!
On the intake issue, have you thought of maybehaving Hogan's build an intake for that motor? generally speaking a sheet metal intake is only really good for the stroker motors but if this motor is intended to run around the 8K mark sheet metal may be the way to go. Just my .02.
P.S. when you gonna let your kid navigate for me?
On the intake issue, have you thought of maybehaving Hogan's build an intake for that motor? generally speaking a sheet metal intake is only really good for the stroker motors but if this motor is intended to run around the 8K mark sheet metal may be the way to go. Just my .02.
P.S. when you gonna let your kid navigate for me?
The thing to notice is that if this car was shifted at 7400 rpm it whould never fall
below 450 rwhp.
Stay tuned.
Thanks
Lou Gigliotti
You especially should know what a pain in the a$$ that shift is on a road tack...
chris
(watching solid rollers with interest)
****This is in no way meant as a bash- Great results*****
Why are shops still spending R&D money on solid roller setups that require custom intakes ($$$$) to get 470 RWHP out of a 346 when 470 is attainable with hyd. roller?
Is it just for Higher RPM (more area under the curve?)
Why are shops still spending R&D money on solid roller setups that require custom intakes ($$$$) to get 470 RWHP out of a 346 when 470 is attainable with hyd. roller?
Is it just for Higher RPM (more area under the curve?)
****This is in no way meant as a bash- Great results*****
Why are shops still spending R&D money on solid roller setups that require custom intakes ($$$$) to get 470 RWHP out of a 346 when 470 is attainable with hyd. roller?
Is it just for Higher RPM (more area under the curve?)
Why are shops still spending R&D money on solid roller setups that require custom intakes ($$$$) to get 470 RWHP out of a 346 when 470 is attainable with hyd. roller?
Is it just for Higher RPM (more area under the curve?)
Cause the 470 HYD setups ARE BULLSHIT
Take it to the track On a more serious note, this 470 was done wiht an LS6 intake and as he said, hes hoping for 500rwhp with an aftermarket intake. Solid rollers have a killer topend pull. DO some overlays on solid Vs hyd and check out the difference in power at different RPMS.
Gonna have to agree with Cammin even if the car pulls some great numbers it is always done with many tricks open headers, short belt, no air filter etc. Take the car to the track and a Solid Roller will walk all over those so called 450 plus hyd. motors.
****This is in no way meant as a bash- Great results*****
Why are shops still spending R&D money on solid roller setups that require custom intakes ($$$$) to get 470 RWHP out of a 346 when 470 is attainable with hyd. roller?
Is it just for Higher RPM (more area under the curve?)
Why are shops still spending R&D money on solid roller setups that require custom intakes ($$$$) to get 470 RWHP out of a 346 when 470 is attainable with hyd. roller?
Is it just for Higher RPM (more area under the curve?)





