4.8 redline
I'm just wondering with the stock rotating assembly, what kind of RPM's this motor could turn given the ideal cam and valve train. I know displacement is king but high revs, numerically high gears, and a manual transmission sounds fun.
You are right, displacement is king. Your combo sounds great on paper, but rod ratios are typically the things of engineers pipe dreams, in this forum. Many will tell you the right length rod is the one that reaches all the way from the crankshaft and connects to the piston pin.
For anything street driven, more displacement (5.3, 5.7, 6.0, etc.) will always make more power with the same hardware, at a lower RPM. That engine won't require all the high $$$ lightweight parts to build anything reliable that would see the rpm's you are looking for.
For what its worth, many people feel a 2001+ LS1 with stock internals is good for 6500 - 6800 rpms. For every three of them, there is one who'll tell you he spun his 97-00 LS1 to 7200+ every chance he got.
BTW - welcome to LS1tech!
I'm just wondering with the stock rotating assembly, what kind of RPM's this motor could turn given the ideal cam and valve train. I know displacement is king but high revs, numerically high gears, and a manual transmission sounds fun.
There are plenty of people pushing fully forged 4" stroke motors, with abysmal 1.5x rod ratios, over 8000rpms with LLSR cams. The rod ratio does not come into play so much as the quality of the components, things like grain structure in the metal mean a lot more than rod ratios.
Believe me, I will never build anything with a rod ratio of less than 1.60, because I think it is unnecessary and mechanically stupid to do so. But if you want more than 7500rpms, you really need to be using a fully forged rotating assembly.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time






