Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.8 redline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2007, 07:16 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Pyrotechnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 4.8 redline

I was checking out the 4.8 and although it's less cubic inches it's got a 3.27 stroke and 6.278 rods which means a rod/stroke ratio of 1.92 which is VERY good. This is just a touch more than the 69 Z/28 302 (1.9 rod/stroke ratio). It should rev like crazy without too much stress on rotating assembly.

I'm just wondering with the stock rotating assembly, what kind of RPM's this motor could turn given the ideal cam and valve train. I know displacement is king but high revs, numerically high gears, and a manual transmission sounds fun.
Old 11-16-2007, 07:32 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Prerun4fun13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im no expert but i would think around 6500 RPM if you arent going to upgrade to ARP rod bolts and such.
Old 11-16-2007, 07:44 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Prepare for the onslaught of people who will come in to tell you are wasting your time.

You are right, displacement is king. Your combo sounds great on paper, but rod ratios are typically the things of engineers pipe dreams, in this forum. Many will tell you the right length rod is the one that reaches all the way from the crankshaft and connects to the piston pin.

For anything street driven, more displacement (5.3, 5.7, 6.0, etc.) will always make more power with the same hardware, at a lower RPM. That engine won't require all the high $$$ lightweight parts to build anything reliable that would see the rpm's you are looking for.

For what its worth, many people feel a 2001+ LS1 with stock internals is good for 6500 - 6800 rpms. For every three of them, there is one who'll tell you he spun his 97-00 LS1 to 7200+ every chance he got.

BTW - welcome to LS1tech!
Old 11-16-2007, 07:58 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
H8Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

An some who have blown them up in less then 50k with just boltons..... It's all a matter of how hard you beat on it. Most of the ls series engines share the same componets. not the same rotating assembly but, different variations of bore and stokes to give the 4.8, 5.3, 5.7, 6.0 displacements.
Old 11-16-2007, 09:41 PM
  #5  
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As long as the oiling is good it could probably handle 7500. Run it with the carbstyle victor jr intake. Mill the heads and tighten the quench. It might make 400rwhp
Old 09-09-2016, 09:00 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
05GTO6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pyrotechnic
I was checking out the 4.8 and although it's less cubic inches it's got a 3.27 stroke and 6.278 rods which means a rod/stroke ratio of 1.92 which is VERY good. This is just a touch more than the 69 Z/28 302 (1.9 rod/stroke ratio). It should rev like crazy without too much stress on rotating assembly.

I'm just wondering with the stock rotating assembly, what kind of RPM's this motor could turn given the ideal cam and valve train. I know displacement is king but high revs, numerically high gears, and a manual transmission sounds fun.
I have an 6.0 LS with a 3.622 stroke im spinning to 7200 with hardened pushrods, yella terra lightweight rockers, and stainless steel valves from the 2.5 stage cnc porting at texas speed.However the only reason i got the valves is because a timing gear failure and valves were bent etc not a fun time. However the failure wasnt from rpm so dont worry about that. i could probably push mine to 7400 but thatd be really pushing it, a 4.8 could probably do 7800 MAYBE 8 it you dont care how many runs you get but make sure to get a lightweight valvetrain and upgraded oil pump, saw a thread a while back where someone over revved by downshifting and the oil pump failed, so im guessing thats a weakness
Old 09-09-2016, 01:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

With the right valvetrain, proper oil control, and upgraded rod bolts, you could push the stock rotating assembly to 7500rpms on a pretty consistent basis. Anything more than that and you are approaching the potential failure point of cast parts.

There are plenty of people pushing fully forged 4" stroke motors, with abysmal 1.5x rod ratios, over 8000rpms with LLSR cams. The rod ratio does not come into play so much as the quality of the components, things like grain structure in the metal mean a lot more than rod ratios.

Believe me, I will never build anything with a rod ratio of less than 1.60, because I think it is unnecessary and mechanically stupid to do so. But if you want more than 7500rpms, you really need to be using a fully forged rotating assembly.
Old 09-09-2016, 08:21 PM
  #8  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 05GTO6.0
I have an 6.0 LS with a 3.622 stroke im spinning to 7200 with hardened pushrods, yella terra lightweight rockers, and stainless steel valves from the 2.5 stage cnc porting at texas speed.However the only reason i got the valves is because a timing gear failure and valves were bent etc not a fun time. However the failure wasnt from rpm so dont worry about that. i could probably push mine to 7400 but thatd be really pushing it, a 4.8 could probably do 7800 MAYBE 8 it you dont care how many runs you get but make sure to get a lightweight valvetrain and upgraded oil pump, saw a thread a while back where someone over revved by downshifting and the oil pump failed, so im guessing thats a weakness
This thread was from 2007 dude.



Quick Reply: 4.8 redline



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.