Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: What heads will work best w/ my setup?
Patriot Stage II 5.3 heads
3
7.69%
Patriot Stage II LS6 heads
8
20.51%
TSP Stage 2.5 5.3 heads
21
53.85%
TSP Stage 2.5 LS6 heads
7
17.95%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

The age long question: 5.3 vs LS6 for my setup...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:08 AM
  #21  
fueledpassion's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Vrbas
What if i milled the heads, would LS6 be a better choice? Say like 62cc?
That depends on how good the heads flowed before milling. You'll be killing some CFM by milling, but everyone already knows that. That is why the guy previously recommended you to check out flow numbers for both heads after milling, at the same cc.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #22  
3rdgentug's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: memphis, tennessee
Default

tsp 2.5 5.3 and be done w/ it
on stock cubes your not going to get a much better budget head out of the box!

i think the stage 2 ls6 heads would be way overkill for your setup.
those are generally used on bigger displacement motors
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #23  
chuckyt1's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
Default

I went with PRC LS6's. Milled 'em .030, .045 Cometics and 2.02 valves. 462 rwhp with a Rex... Lots of torque
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #24  
silverbullitLS1's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Andrews, TX
Default

my brother barely got the 5.3 heads and ms3 cam and came up with 420 rwhp on the dyno at TSP. i would go with the 5.3 heads
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #25  
Camaro99SS's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

5.3's without a doubt

If you're comparing 2 heads with the same or very similar flow numbers, always go with the one with the smallest ports for the best low end, mid range, driveability, and in most cases the most hp. The only downside to the 5.3 is there is less piston to valve clearance, but you should be fine with the cam you already have. Just don't run a thinner head gasket without flycutting.

Jason
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #26  
Vrbas's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Default

So would milled LS6 style be a bad idea?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 08:30 PM
  #27  
COPOSS's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: ST.LOUIS MISSOURI
Default

I like the LS6, but my post sent me to AFR's 205. You'r cam is the same one i'am looking at 228/232.I think the best way would be flow #'s, And mostly track times with the same set up.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 08:44 AM
  #28  
donalr76's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Texarkana, TX
Default

I like TSP 5.3L, TEA are just as good and I am looking for the most bang for the buck. I am sure AFR and QTP are better heads, but who can afford some 2500 to 3500 heads?
I sure as hell can't.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 03:08 AM
  #29  
ricernomore's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

im looking at the same heads now(stage 2 5.3l) and i have a torquer 2 and from what i understand my cam will clear so that shouldnt be and issue, but it looks like everything here just sold me to the stage two 5.3 just need to find the price i like
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #30  
91_RS_LS1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Northeast TN
Default

I'm thinking the 2.5 5.3s and the Torquer V2 with full bolt ons. Would this set-up with GM gaskets keep me away from fly cutting?
I don't want a set-up that pulls hard at 4000+. I'd rather have something that pulls pretty strong through as much of the range as possible.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.