241's worth porting?
The TSP PRC stage 1 heads would be a good choice.
The TSP PRC stage 1 heads would be a good choice.
You got it backwards. Any LS1 head properly ported will flow about the same as each other. Be it 853, 241, or 243. Hand porting if done correctly can sometimes yield better results over just a cnc. Now I am not saying out of the box so don't try to jump all over me for saying that they are all equal. But if you have seen port jobs on all it is damn hard to determine which is which if there are no identifying marks on the head. Unless of course it is perimeter pattern.
Oh yeah. this is getting moved to internal.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Also was wondering what the 241's you offer flow?
Thanks
Warren
Last edited by wildta; Dec 17, 2007 at 06:21 PM.
I got them from "badbird" on here & he made 430rwhp with a TSP 233/239 112lsa cam and these heads.
I havent used them because they wont work with my big cam. I will get these heads flowed after the 1st of the year.
According to How To Build High-Performance Chevy LS1/LS6 V-8s, the early and late LS1 head ports are the same. The reason later heads flow better is the different casting methods producing a better as cast port. As stated in the first reply, the end result would be essentially the same no matter which head you start with.
I've never heard of anyone losing a shortblock due to flycutting. If done properly, and care is taken to keep any debris out of the cylinder wall, its the only way to run a stock casting head milled for the proper compression. You will need to get your heads as close to 59cc as possible for the best results, and I would not recommend a larger valve (which reduces piston to valve clearance).


Nicely put Orange. Only those who want to help vendors sell some new castings buy the idea that porting stock heads is pointless.



