valve spring failure results...
lucky it was at low rpm cruise,heard some racket,shut it off and coasted to the side of the road and towed it home...
time to plan on building something to replace the engine with anyhow...
i have no fear of running comp single springs again...these broke and worked well up until then,so i will have to wait and see...
All parts work well up until they break, lol.



all things considered,i got off light...a nifty set of those patriot heads are tops on my list right now...
Last edited by brokenfly; Mar 3, 2008 at 12:00 PM.
it looks like comp is doing a good job of addressing the 918 snafu,so no,i have no problems with comp...
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I'm surprised at the issues they have been having,
Hopefully they will get them all worked out.
And a set of Patroit heads complete are a great bang
for the buck.
You cant run 600 on the singles and expect 20k out of them.
He has about 10-11k on the springs, they are older comp 918's with Ti retainers and even he will be checking them after this season. The cam lobes are not aggressive and he def hammers on it.
I think as long as people are conceious of whats happening, at least you stand a chance of not dropping a valve.
I had 987's in my LT1 and I had a valve hit #7 intake and the inner spring kept it up so it just bent and didnt shatter inside. Its a nice redundency the dual spring but singles can be fine too. Its just not a install and for get about it thing.
There are plenty of other engine components that need warming up (pistons, etc.), but your springs are ready to go from the start.
Anyways, again those springs failed from a design flaw/manufacturing issue. The upper end coiled failed first. It could have actually run a little while like that without you noticing. What we call a soft failure. Then the body fractured and the valve dropped.
Our original design for the 918 (now PAC-1218) was made so that the spring should last the life of your engine. It is not a high stress design. Made right, it will last that long.
Hell, I believe that if you call Comp they recommend checking them at 30k miles. Which is a number they just arbitrarily picked.
It is highly likely that even if he had checked his springs, he would have not found any problems. A crack can propagate at the speed of sound, through steel. And since I believe this is a manufacture/design defect, the typical "load loss before failure" would not have been present.
Just my 2 cents.
As for the original poster. I would swap PAC-1518s in and never have worry about them again. Or go to a Patriot dual.
Last edited by Yeahdoug; Mar 3, 2008 at 03:17 PM.
1. How did you know there was a problem in the first place? In other words, what did you hear or feel that told you to check and see if one of the springs had failed?
2. When a valve spring fails like this, what other problems could have occured along with it?
Is there something I'm missing here in aftermarket design? I know a LOT of us have bought used LSx cars and have only pushed it at it's hardest late in it's supposed life. I don't even think the previous owner of my car brought the revs up to 6k, let along 6500rpm repeatedly at a track prior to my cam install. I had almost 100k on my car before it saw hard track days.
It's funny to think that GM somehow makes their springs out of what? Unbreakium? Unobtainableaftermarktium?
I'd understand if you were bringing the spring to close to it's max lift or running 7krpm 99% of the time, but when you consider the life of an engine, most of it is spent UNDER 3k. This only further makes you wonder about the materials used and the engineering behind them.





