Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

had enough of low end cam surge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2008, 06:55 PM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
mattraypharbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: palmharbor/Clearwater,FL
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive got no surge on a 236 242 601 610 112 lsa cam on stock 241 castings Its idling quite low and has no surging and or bucking of any kind and it will idle from a cold start with no surge or bucking or staling of any kind. Ur tuner is trying tp pull a fast one!
Old 03-10-2008, 06:58 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
mattraypharbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: palmharbor/Clearwater,FL
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cobra Huntter
well i have a ms3 cam and what helps is to drill a bigger whole in the t/b.
Do not do what he did! Its the redneck shade tree kind of way out and your car will still be runing on a shity tune that could have god knows what else wrong with it!
Old 03-10-2008, 06:58 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
DaveX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I can tell you as someone who is doing his own tuning that it takes alot of time to get all of the surge/bucking out of it. I'm sure it would be quicker if it wasn't my first one but it still takes alot of time logging and tweaking. Is your car an A4 or M6? Mine was bucking so bad I couldn't drive it with my foot off the gas. This was with airflow/IAC in line, AFR where it should be, tried timing all over the place, and many hours spent tweaking the "learning" tables. I could make it better but I never could get it to go away completely until I raised the TCC unlock/lock speeds a bit. Now it still surges a little at idle and coming to a stop but no bucking at all while driving at speed.
Old 03-10-2008, 07:02 PM
  #24  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
mattraypharbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: palmharbor/Clearwater,FL
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Puppet_Master
My tuner told me that the more you make the cam 'lope' the more it will buck like that at low end. So it's more of a balance between driver quality and how you want it to sound.

Wrong! my car idles and drives like yours does or any other realtivly stock car lol your so wrong its not even funny!
Old 03-10-2008, 07:17 PM
  #25  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SLP Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hellertown, PA
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shoemike
is the guy is using ls1 edit?
i had 2 lousy tunes from people using edit.
the RAFIG process cured my cam surge,
and i think that is exclusive to EFILive/HPTuners
no he is using HP tuners
and the car is an M6
matt from HSW's told me that he spend almost 2 days trying to tune it and couldn't get it any better than it already was.. he also had 2 mass air flow sensors to work with stock and SLP
i have ls6 intake ported TB lT's no cats

does anyone know of PSI motor sports? its really close to my house but he works on alot fords and boosted cars but his reputation is threw the roof.

also this guy in deleware "fran96SS" from race proven motor sports" keeps trying to get me to come down is he any good? he says he'll make my car 100%
Old 03-10-2008, 08:15 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
 
landonew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL.
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
Time is time, and you still should pay them for theirs. If you didn't ask good questions up front to gauge whether or not they could do a good job, then that one is on you. Simply getting in your car and leaving is not a good idea at all...it'd be like accidentally putting 87 octane gas in your car, and driving off without paying because it really wasn't what you wanted.

This is exactly why I've never gone into the tuning business...there are just too many internet experts out there, and too many people that think they should be getting world class service for coach fare. People just don't realize how much up front money is required to have all of the models/licenses available to run a tuning business. There are tons of costs that they need to cover, so don't expect them to react well to you walking out on them without paying.
NOT TRYING TO FLAME BY ANY MEANS. I see your point, but what is the deal with all the shop sympathy all of the sudden (not just this thread)? I know if I told a client that i could do something, then I would expect to get paid if and when the objective was accomplished. I am not in the business of giving guarantees, really can't in my business, but if i did then i would either feast or starve with the objective/goal. I don't understand why a speed shop should be any different? I typically don't get paid for substandard work, in fact i would get sued for malpractice if violated professional standards of conduct. I think that a good shop should be able to either stand bye their guarantees/representations, or maybe they should get into a different business. Just my .02.
Old 03-10-2008, 08:22 PM
  #27  
Staging Lane
 
Puppet_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattraypharbor
Wrong! my car idles and drives like yours does or any other realtivly stock car lol your so wrong its not even funny!
I have a tr230 111lsa cam and my car drives pretty much stock too. But if I wanted it to chop more, then it probably wouldn't drive pretty much stock. This is what the guy told me who tuned my car and has been doing this for nearly 30 years.
Old 03-10-2008, 08:31 PM
  #28  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SLP Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hellertown, PA
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Puppet_Master
I have a tr230 111lsa cam and my car drives pretty much stock too. But if I wanted it to chop more, then it probably wouldn't drive pretty much stock. This is what the guy told me who tuned my car and has been doing this for nearly 30 years.
well i have a torquer v2 112 lsa so urs is kinda close to mine... it drive fine except when i'm cruising with light throttle or deacelleration i think its bullshit really that a tuner couldn't get rid of it. i know it wont drive exactly like stock but there shouldn't be that much drivetrain surge were i can't even put the car in 5th till 60 mph
Old 03-10-2008, 08:40 PM
  #29  
Staging Lane
 
Puppet_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn, do you have stock gears? See what my tuner did is first worked on drive quality meaning tinkering with not WOT conditions. Once he got that done, he then worked on WOT conditions which according to him is a lot easier to do than drive quality. My point is maybe the guy tuning your car just did WOT/idle tuning and failed to adjust for drive quality conditions. Did the bucking change at all from before to after the tune?
Old 03-10-2008, 08:46 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
FMX05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah lots of places the basic tune is idle and WOT. A drivability tune takes a good bit of time logging and changing things as you go. Obviously some places are faster than others. Especially if they have tuned a similar combo before. They can upload the tune from the other car and tweak from there.
Old 03-10-2008, 08:47 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: norcal
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there will always be a lil bucking or surging with a big cam. its not stock so it wont drive like it either.
Old 03-10-2008, 08:50 PM
  #32  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Russ K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 810
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

A 112 lsa camshaft will have more low rpm/light throttle surge than a 114 lsa.

Russ Kemp
Old 03-10-2008, 08:50 PM
  #33  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
FMX05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah but a Torquer 2 isn't really THAT big. Not to the point where 5th gear is unusable till 60mph. He isn't running a 257/266 110 LSA cam like you are =-). I'm gonna ask you again how the **** did you get that thing tuned. And do you have a sound clip?

Last edited by FMX05; 03-10-2008 at 09:23 PM.
Old 03-10-2008, 08:52 PM
  #34  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
gsxr1k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: A Mile High
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anybody tried the software swap with texas speed?
Old 03-10-2008, 08:57 PM
  #35  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SLP Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hellertown, PA
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Puppet_Master
Damn, do you have stock gears? See what my tuner did is first worked on drive quality meaning tinkering with not WOT conditions. Once he got that done, he then worked on WOT conditions which according to him is a lot easier to do than drive quality. My point is maybe the guy tuning your car just did WOT/idle tuning and failed to adjust for drive quality conditions. Did the bucking change at all from before to after the tune?
yes i do have stock gears so i understand that is hurting me but i just rebuilt the rear about 1000 miles ago and i didn't do gears because i liked the gas mileage i was getting with them. i didn't realize gear would have anything to do with a cam but it would probly take me out of that 1600and below rpm bucking surging area.. and he claims he spent alot of time with the driveability part because i took it back there and he had it for 4 days
Old 03-10-2008, 08:58 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SLP Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hellertown, PA
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FMX05
Yeah but a Torquer 2 isn't really THAT big. Not to the point where 5th gear is unusable till 60mph. He isn't running a 257/266 110 LSA cam like you are =-). I'm gonna as you again how the **** did you get that thing tuned. And do you have a sound clip?
yeah i didn't think a T2 was that big either were it couldn't be tuned out above 2k rpm its fine but below that... it just wants to start acting up and once it starts with an M6 it doesn't stop and sometimes when i give it gas it gets really bad to the point were i have to put in the clutch
Old 03-10-2008, 09:14 PM
  #37  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: norcal
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FMX05
Yeah but a Torquer 2 isn't really THAT big. Not to the point where 5th gear is unusable till 60mph. He isn't running a 257/266 110 LSA cam like you are =-). I'm gonna as you again how the **** did you get that thing tuned. And do you have a sound clip?
my tuner will not be having fun when it comes time to dyno tune lets leave it at that.

my car has around 150 miles on the new motor so far still breaking it in.

here is a the sound clip from when i did the first start.

insnt the torquer2 in the 230's...thats considered extreme on the how to site.

also i ran the t-rex and g5x3 when i had the stock motor and there was still a lil bucking and surging bigger cams do not like low rpm



http://videos.streetfire.net/video/f...tte_142775.htm
Old 03-10-2008, 09:20 PM
  #38  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
89 formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

there should be next to no bucking. I went through this on my old car (differant eng. but similar grind) below 2000-2500 rpm at a constant cruise it would buck so bad you had to either raise the rpms way up or push in the clutch. there are people who have much more wilder cams that run fine. I never got it just right but I messed with just about every table and it seemed like the more basic I made the tables the better it got. kind of a detune type of style... but I really don't know how to tune as I won't claim to I just know it was at least drivable towards the end when I didn't have intake leaks
Old 03-10-2008, 09:21 PM
  #39  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (13)
 
rosey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hear ya, my car was pretty much just like you are describing even after I did some tunining and got the RAFIG and AFR mostly on. I spent a lot of time tuning and while it was getting better, I just couldn't get it quite right. This was with a 232/240 112 stick in a m6 car with 4.1 gears and about ~2800lb weight.

I decided to pick up some ported heads and a 224/228 110 cam to swap in. Working with a shop I'm sure we could have gotten it better with the bigger cam, but I won't let anyone work on my car, so that is out for me. I'm sure its just a matter of finding the right tuner that will take his time on it and get it right.
Old 03-10-2008, 09:32 PM
  #40  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
FMX05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by santiago
my tuner will not be having fun when it comes time to dyno tune lets leave it at that.

my car has around 150 miles on the new motor so far still breaking it in.

here is a the sound clip from when i did the first start.

insnt the torquer2 in the 230's...thats considered extreme on the how to site.

also i ran the t-rex and g5x3 when i had the stock motor and there was still a lil bucking and surging bigger cams do not like low rpm



http://videos.streetfire.net/video/f...tte_142775.htm
Crap man, I think you passed up a donkey dick cam and went straight to a stallion... I hope you bring your tuner a bottle of vicodin when you go, he is gonna need it.

The G5x3 and the Trex you had are bigger than the torquer 2. This is straight off Texas speed's site.



Originally Posted by Texas Speed
The Texas Speed Torquer 2 232/234 .595/.598 Camshaft With Your Choice of Lobe Seperation.

This camshaft features Comp Cams XER lobes! The XER lobes have been proven to make big horsepower & torque thanks to their aggressive ramp rates & healthy lift.

1800-6400 RPM Power Band; This is an excellent performance camshaft with a smooth idle! Custom tuning for automatic cars required

This camshaft typically gains approximately 45-50rwhp!
Available on a 112,113, or 114 LSA. I think it is very feasible to expect good drivability from this cam. Personal opinion of course. We need some tuners in here.


Quick Reply: had enough of low end cam surge



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.