Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast 90/90

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2008, 06:51 PM
  #21  
on2
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
on2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FAST 92's have been out to replace the 90's. The base price is slightly more than the 90's.
Old 06-24-2008, 07:17 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
sidewayz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

lol why would fast 90s go up in price? just because it was discontinued doesnt make it a collectors item....The 92mm has replaced the 90 just like on2 mentioned ^^^
Old 06-24-2008, 07:39 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Soul TKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

=
Old 06-24-2008, 10:46 PM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
PassionateZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eamador11
I gained 24RWHP, 19rwt. with a Tony Mamo ported FAST90. just swapped out ls6 intake thats all.

plus the gains are across the rpm RPM band not just at peak.
Is this realistic people, i mean really, you gained 24twhp/19rwtq over the Ls6 intake?? So over a stock intake your saying it gives around 30-35 rwhp/25-30rwtq?
Old 06-24-2008, 10:57 PM
  #25  
Banned Village Idiot
iTrader: (36)
 
LS1BLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anaheim,CA
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i had a LS6 intake in my car and i got the Fast 90/90 ,but i can't tell you how much of a difference it was cuz i got a cam at the same time with some other mods... i say they are worth the money 430RWHP
Old 06-24-2008, 11:29 PM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
sidewayz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PassionateZ
Is this realistic people, i mean really, you gained 24twhp/19rwtq over the Ls6 intake?? So over a stock intake your saying it gives around 30-35 rwhp/25-30rwtq?
its a large gain over the LS1 intake....
Old 06-25-2008, 01:27 AM
  #27  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PassionateZ
Is this realistic people, i mean really, you gained 24twhp/19rwtq over the Ls6 intake?? So over a stock intake your saying it gives around 30-35 rwhp/25-30rwtq?
Yes....with good heads (making a stock intake a larger restriction) the average gains from my ported gold....I mean plastic...FAST intakes are usually 20-25 RWHP over an LS6 baseline....add 5 more to that if the base manifold is an LS1 or LS2 (the worst performing stock intakes). Big money but big gains (I figure a Mamo ported intake is like a gold brick and a half right?....LOL).

I tested a customers 6.0 litre on an engine dyno awhile back (fitted with AFR 205 heads and a mild hyd. roller cam...228 ish)....with no other changes besides removing the stock LS2 intake and swapping on one of my ported FAST 90's (even stayed with the same BBK cable operated 85 mm TB on both tests....not an optimal TB), we immediatly saw 32 HP gain in peak to peak numbers (40 HP past peak) and 20 more ft/lbs of torque over about 1500 RPM. It was ridiculous honestly and it looked like we did a head swap when you over layed the two dyno curves.

Needless to say I didnt take the ported FAST home with me that day.....LOL

Tony
Old 06-25-2008, 02:10 AM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Soul TKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
the average gains from my ported gold....I mean plastic...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.