MLS Head Gasket Thickness vs. Strength
27, 30, 36, 40, 45, 51, 60, 65, 71, 74, 120
Is there any difference in the sealing ability of a thicker vs. a thiner gasket?
The only reason I can see to go with a thicker gasket (presumming there is no difference in sealing ability/durability) is that it would allow you a bit more compression height on the piston which us LS1 guys are always surching for it seems.
Or does it make sense to start with the thinest gasket possible, just in case the deck needs to be machined for any reason in the future?
I am preparing to build my first long block, and will be using custom pistons. I want to play my squish as tight as possible and was considering trying to end up .002" in the hole and using the .027 gaskets. This is for a big bore NA motor, with a SCR 11.4-11.9.
If this motor is going to stay NA, as I am reading, a gasket that will achieve the SCR and keep a "good" quench size, should be enough for you. Chamber size, Bore size, piston dish/dome, etc.
Overall, most MLS/Cometic gaskets will seal fine, but need a tad more info to help make the correct call.
But I was wondering, theoretically, if there was any difference in head gasket strength based solely on its thickness.
So you are saying that you believe a thinner gasket to have better sealing abilities than a thick one?
So you are saying that you believe a thinner gasket to have better sealing abilities than a thick one?
(Changing that thickness can change/dictate your desired SCR/Cylinder Quench.)






