Fast 102 on stock cube LS2? is it to much?
Especially if your running aggressive max effort setups like those with the big name big cams, ported heads...etc.
Ported intakes choke donkey crank compared to these things. Yeah I'm sad that it costs a fortune too but that doesnt mean it doesnt work EVERY time on EVERYTHING. From a stock LS1 up to a wild LS3 these things give gains every single time someone puts one on over a stock intake. Crazy that there are still disbelievers left after all these years.
Yeah I'm sad that it costs a fortune too but that doesnt mean it doesnt work EVERY time on EVERYTHING. From a stock LS1 up to a wild LS3 these things give gains every single time someone puts one on over a stock intake. Crazy that there are still disbelievers left after all these years.
Like the spoiler delete, BTW.
FAST 102's on LS3's are where the gains are weak. The LS2 intake is the runt of the family-
I just snagged my 3rd C6 and it only has a CAI and axleback and I will be adding the FAST 102/catch can next as well. Then the LT's, cam and AFR/TFS's to follow-
there's one.... and many more on this fourm. LS1 thread or not Neumonic2002 lS1, LS2 or LS3 waste of money buying the intake. buy a fogger and be done with it. but there again if you have 1500$ to through around for 20 hp that you will only see a difference one the dyno go ahead. I agree there are LS based cars with gains but 20hp.... like i said i bought one,....junk in my opinion. 1500$=20hp or a example " texas-speed MS4" 385$=40-60hp gain. you do the math.
Just sayin'
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I am not going to run NOS so that is not worth comparing, with me anyway.
Again, for an LS2 your way off on cost and performance though. I paid $822 delivered to my door with new gaskets, installed myself....sold my ported LS2 intake for $300 and paid my tuner $50.
If I already had the cam I am looking at my gains would have been even larger, probably another 10/10.
Maybe your issue was with your tune?







