Fast 102 LSXr for LS3 Plenum Volume
#2
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hope Mills, NC
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Plenum is not much larger. It looks bigger but the ports are longer cutting into the what would-be a larger volume plenum. Port volume is about 830cc vs 600cc stock. Flow is about 10-12cfm over stock but port length is longer by about 1 3/4" due to the wrap-around, bell-mouth design. Just ruff data....
#3
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Plenum is not much larger. It looks bigger but the ports are longer cutting into the what would-be a larger volume plenum. Port volume is about 830cc vs 600cc stock. Flow is about 10-12cfm over stock but port length is longer by about 1 3/4" due to the wrap-around, bell-mouth design. Just ruff data....
#4
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm very surprised that the FAST has both a larger plenum chamber and larger longer runners.
With these I would expect it to be quite an improvement on a LS3, however I am yet to see any conclusive data from either the quarter or dyno that it makes any power difference at all
With these I would expect it to be quite an improvement on a LS3, however I am yet to see any conclusive data from either the quarter or dyno that it makes any power difference at all
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)